A 3D comparison of humeral head retroversion by sex and measurement technique

Background Accurate humeral head reconstruction during shoulder arthroplasty is partially dependent on correctly estimating and replicating native version. The present study evaluated the effects of sex and measurement technique on three-dimensional (3D) humeral version measurements made using the t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Shoulder & elbow Vol. 10; no. 3; pp. 192 - 200
Main Authors: West, Emily A., Knowles, Nikolas K., Athwal, George S., Ferreira, Louis M.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: London, England SAGE Publications 01-07-2018
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background Accurate humeral head reconstruction during shoulder arthroplasty is partially dependent on correctly estimating and replicating native version. The present study evaluated the effects of sex and measurement technique on three-dimensional (3D) humeral version measurements made using the transepicondylar, forearm and flexion–extension axes. Methods Fifty-two full-arm computed tomography scans were converted to 3D models and geometry extracted to define landmarks and coordinate systems. An anatomic humeral head osteotomy plane was used to measure version relative to the three measurement techniques and compare between sexes. Results The measurement technique used had a significant affect (p < 0.001) on the resulting version measurement. The forearm axis technique consistently resulted in higher measured version compared to either the flexion–extension [mean (SD) males 9° (4°), females 13° (5°), p < 0.001] or the transepicondylar axes [mean (SD) males 8° (4°), females 11° (4°), p < 0.001]. Version in males was 7° greater than females when referencing either the flexion–extension [p = 0.029; mean (SD) males 37.7° (11°), females 30.4° (13°)] or transepicondylar axes [p = 0.045; mean (SD) males 39° (11°), females 32° (12°)]. Conclusions The choice of measurement technique can affect the humeral version angle. These results are important because measuring version using the epicondyles pre-operatively, and subsequently the forearm intra-operatively, will result in approximately 10° under-retroverted osteotomy. For example, 0° neutral version cut during reverse arthroplasty measured referencing the forearm results in 10° anteverted osteotomy when referencing the distal humerus.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1758-5732
1758-5740
DOI:10.1177/1758573217711897