Catalytic Nitrate Removal in a Trickle Bed Reactor Direct Drinking Water Treatment
Palladium (Pd)-based catalysts hold promise as an alternative water treatment technology for nitrate (NO₃–), but practical application requires a flow-through reactor that efficiently delivers hydrogen (H₂) from gas to water. A trickle bed reactor (TBR) packed with a 0.1 percent by weight (wt%) Pd–0...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal - American Water Works Association Vol. 109; no. 5; pp. E144 - E157 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Denver
John Wiley and Sons, Inc
01-05-2017
American Water Works Association |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Palladium (Pd)-based catalysts hold promise as an alternative water treatment technology for nitrate (NO₃–), but practical application requires a flow-through reactor that efficiently delivers hydrogen (H₂) from gas to water. A trickle bed reactor (TBR) packed with a 0.1 percent by weight (wt%) Pd–0.01 wt% In/γ-Al₂O₃ (indium and porous aluminum oxide) catalyst was evaluated to address this challenge. Catalytic activity generally increased with H₂ superficial velocity (0.65–29.6 m/h) and liquid (deionized water) superficial velocities from 14.8 to 26.6 m/h before decreasing at 38.5 m/h. This decrease corresponded to a change in flow regime and suggests that optimal TBR performance occurs at the transition from pulse to bubble flow. An optimal TBR activity of 19.5 ± 1.3 mg NO₃–/min-g Pd was obtained; this is only ~18% of the batch reactor activity as a result of H₂ mass transfer limitations, but three to 15 times greater than activities obtained with previous flow-through reactors. Catalyst deactivation occurred in the TBR after 41 days of operation, motivating the need for improved fouling mitigation strategies. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0003-150X 1551-8833 |
DOI: | 10.5942/jawwa.2017.109.0056 |