Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Evaluation of the Nursing Decision-Making Instrument Into European Portuguese

• Published in: SAGE open nursing Vol. 10; p. 23779608241278611
• Main Authors: Paiva, Ivo Cristiano Soares, Neves, Teresa Margarida Almeida, Ventura, Filipa Isabel Quaresma Santos, Vilela, António Carlos Lopes, Moreira, Isabel Maria Pinheiro Borges
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States SAGE Publications 01-01-2024; SAGE Publishing
• Subjects: Original; psychometrics; factor analysis; statistical; nursing; validation study; decision making
• ISSN: 2377-9608; 2377-9608
• DOI: 10.1177/23779608241278611

Nurses are continually faced with multiple demands to make decisions in their clinical practice. The Nursing Decision-Making Instrument (NDMI) assesses nurses' decision-making styles during the several stages of this process.
To adapt the NDMI into European Portuguese and evaluate the psychometric properties of the Portuguese version in a population of Portuguese nurses.
Descriptive study design was used to examine psychometric properties of NDMI. Nonprobability convenience sample of 339 Portuguese direct-care nurses. Data were collected using a questionnaire comprising sociodemographic and professional data and the NDMI-Portuguese version (NDMI-PT). An exploratory factor analysis (EFA;
= 125) and a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA;
= 214) were carried out using IBM SPSS (v. 24) and AMOS (v. 22).
The EFA revealed a structure of four latent factors, which represent the reorganized stages of the decision-making process. The CFA found a good overall fit of the model (χ
/df = 2.13; comparative fit index [CFI] = 0.91; goodness of fit index [GFI] = 0.82; Tucker-Lewis Index [TLI] = 0.90; root mean square error of approximation [RMSEA] = 0.07; maximum-likelihood expected cross-validation index [MECVI] = 3.13). The psychometric analysis of the theoretical structure revealed that the four factors reflect the decision-making stages and have a better overall fit than the empirical structure (χ
/df = 1.82; CFI = 0.94; GFI = 0.86; TLI = 0.93; RMSEA = 0.06; MECVI = 2.55). The analysis of the construct reliability of the NDMI-PT revealed that the overall internal consistency was excellent (
=0.96).
This study revealed that the empirical and theoretical structures were appropriate and valid for the sample under analysis. The NDMI-PT is a reliable and valid tool for assessing nurses' decision-making styles. Studies should be conducted to gain further insight into the robustness of this validated tool.