In-depth farm investigations and an exploratory risk factor analysis for the presence of Salmonella on broiler farms in Great Britain
Salmonella is a major cause of foodborne illness across Europe but there has been little recent research on its control in broiler production in Great Britain. Investigations of Salmonella presence on 20 broiler farms and a separate exploratory risk factor analysis involving 36 Salmonella-positive f...
Saved in:
Published in: | Preventive veterinary medicine Vol. 197; p. 105498 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier B.V
01-12-2021
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Salmonella is a major cause of foodborne illness across Europe but there has been little recent research on its control in broiler production in Great Britain. Investigations of Salmonella presence on 20 broiler farms and a separate exploratory risk factor analysis involving 36 Salmonella-positive farms and 22 Salmonella-negative farms were carried out to investigate Salmonella contamination and control on broiler farms in Great Britain. Sources of Salmonella persistence on farm and potential risk factors for on-farm contamination were identified, enabling provision of up-to-date advice on Salmonella control to farmers.
Twenty broiler farms across England and Wales were intensively sampled over time. Most farms were included in the study after routine testing as part of the Salmonella National Control Programmes (NCPs) identified regulated Salmonella serovars or potential associations with outbreak cases of significance for human health.
Across all farms and visits, the highest proportion of Salmonella-positive samples were from areas exterior to broiler houses compared to anterooms or house interiors. Exterior Salmonella-positive samples were primarily collected from the immediate areas around the houses, with the highest proportions being from drainage, farm tracks/driveways, and pooled water. Elimination of Salmonella was variable but was most successful inside affected houses (compared to exterior areas) and for regulated Salmonella serovars under the Salmonella NCPs and high priority Salmonella strains with multi-drug resistances.
It is likely that the financial and reputational concerns associated with regulated Salmonella serovars and those of greater public health significance underlie the reason that these serovars were more effectively controlled at farm level, as effective elimination of Salmonella can involve a considerable investment in infrastructure, time and resources. Without perceived direct benefits in eliminating non-regulated Salmonella serovars at farm level it can be challenging to maintain the required motivation and investment.
A separate farm-level risk factor analysis was carried out using data collected from 58 broiler farms representing six GB broiler companies. Risk of testing positive for Salmonella via NCP sampling in the previous year was greater in the absence of house-specific anterooms and if at least some poultry houses were surrounded by soil/grass compared to if all were surrounded by concrete or a mixture of concrete and stones/gravel. Odds of testing positive for Salmonella in the previous year was also greater for farms whose maximum holding capacity was >100,000 birds, and farms where the usual number of visitors per day was 0−1 compared to 2−3. The analysis was exploratory and caution is required with interpretation, but results provide preliminary insight into aspects of farm management that may be important, practicable targets for Salmonella control on broiler farms in GB. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0167-5877 1873-1716 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2021.105498 |