Carbon and energy footprint of the hydrate-based biogas upgrading process integrated with CO2 valorization

• Published in: The Science of the total environment Vol. 615; pp. 404 - 411
• Main Authors: Castellani, Beatrice, Rinaldi, Sara, Bonamente, Emanuele, Nicolini, Andrea, Rossi, Federico, Cotana, Franco
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Elsevier B.V 15-02-2018
• Subjects: Biogas upgrading; Carbon footprint; Clathrate hydrates; CO2 methanation; Energy footprint; LCA; Energy footprint; Biogas upgrading; LCA; CO2 methanation; Clathrate hydrates; Carbon footprint
• ISSN: 0048-9697; 1879-1026
• DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.254

The present paper aims at assessing the carbon and energy footprint of an energy process, in which the energy excess from intermittent renewable sources is used to produce hydrogen which reacts with the CO2 previously separated from an innovative biogas upgrading process. The process integrates a hydrate-based biogas upgrading section and a CO2 methanation section, to produce biomethane from the biogas enrichment and synthetic methane from the CO2 methanation. Clathrate hydrates are crystalline compounds, formed by gas enclathrated in cages of water molecules and are applied to the selective separation of CO2 from biogas mixtures. Data from the experimental setup were analyzed in order to evaluate the green-house gas emissions (carbon footprint CF) and the primary energy consumption (energy footprint EF) associated to the two sections of the process. The biosynthetic methane production during a single-stage process was 0.962Nm3, obtained mixing 0.830Nm3 of methane-enriched biogas and 0.132Nm3 of synthetic methane. The final volume composition was: 73.82% CH4, 19.47% CO2, 0.67% H2, 1.98% O2, 4.06% N2 and the energy content was 28.0MJ/Nm3. The functional unit is the unitary amount of produced biosynthetic methane in Nm3. Carbon and energy footprints are 0.7081kgCO2eq/Nm3 and 28.55MJ/Nm3, respectively, when the electric energy required by the process is provided by photovoltaic panels. In this scenario, the overall energy efficiency is about 0.82, higher than the worldwide average energy efficiency for fossil methane, which is 0.75.
[Display omitted]
•The hydrate-based upgrading process is integrated with the CO2 methanation process.•Carbon and energy footprint is evaluated from a cradle-to-gate perspective.•Carbon and energy footprint is 0.7081kgCO2eq and 28.55MJ per 1Nm3 of biosynthetic methane.•Hydrogen production is the most impacting phase of the process.•The environmental footprint of the process is comparable to data for biomethane.