Habitat alteration or climate: What drives the densities of an invading ungulate?

• Published in: Global change biology Vol. 30; no. 4; pp. e17286 - n/a
• Main Authors: Dickie, Melanie, Serrouya, Robert, Becker, Marcus, DeMars, Craig, Noonan, Michael J., Steenweg, Robin, Boutin, Stan, Ford, Adam T.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01-04-2024
• Subjects: Abundance; Animals; Anthropogenic factors; Biodiversity; Biodiversity loss; Boreal forests; camera traps; Canada; Caribou; Climate Change; Deer; Deer - physiology; Ecosystem; Extreme weather; Fecundity; Geographical distribution; Habitats; Introduced Species; invasive species; land‐use; Odocoileus virginianus; Population Density; Rangifer tarandus caribou; Seasons; Spatial variations; Species checklists; Threatened species; weather; Winter; Canada; weather; land‐use; camera traps; invasive species; Odocoileus virginianus; climate change
• ISSN: 1354-1013; 1365-2486
• DOI: 10.1111/gcb.17286

Anthropogenic habitat alteration and climate change are two well‐known contributors to biodiversity loss through changes to species distribution and abundance; yet, disentangling the effects of these two factors is often hindered by their inherent confound across both space and time. We leveraged a contrast in habitat alteration associated with the jurisdictional boundary between two Canadian provinces to evaluate the relative effects of spatial variation in habitat alteration and climate on white‐tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) densities. White‐tailed deer are an invading ungulate across much of North America, whose expansion into Canada's boreal forest is implicated in the decline of boreal caribou (Rangifer tarandus caribou), a species listed as Threatened in Canada. We estimated white‐tailed deer densities using 300 remote cameras across 12 replicated 50 km2 landscapes over 5 years. White‐tailed deer densities were significantly lower in areas where winter severity was higher. For example, predicted deer densities declined from 1.83 to 0.35 deer/km2 when winter severity increased from the lowest value to the median value. There was a tendency for densities to increase with increasing habitat alteration; however, the magnitude of this effect was approximately half that of climate. Our findings suggest that climate is the primary driver of white‐tailed deer populations; however, understanding the mechanisms underpinning this relationship requires further study of over‐winter survival and fecundity. Long‐term monitoring at the invasion front is needed to evaluate the drivers of abundance over time, particularly given the unpredictability of climate change and increasing prevalence of extreme weather events.
In today's fast‐changing world, many ecologists are working to understand how human land‐use and climate impact animal communities, but it is often difficult to decouple these two factors across space and time. We evaluated how human land‐use and climate affect white‐tailed deer densities in western Canada's boreal forest, where they are an invasive species. Taking advantage of a jurisdictional boundary to decouple these two factors, we found that deer numbers were lower in places with harsher winters. However, human land‐use did not affect deer populations strongly. This suggests that habitat restoration alone may not effectively recover the boreal mammal community.