Relationship between spinal alignment and functional disability after thoracolumbar spinal fractures: A systematic review

• Published in: North American Spine Society journal (NASSJ) Vol. 19; p. 100529
• Main Authors: Andrade de Almeida, Romulo Augusto, Call-Orellana, Francisco, Joaquim, Andrei Fernandes
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Elsevier Inc 01-09-2024; Elsevier
• Subjects: Functional outcomes; Sagittal alignment; Spine; Systematic review; Trauma; Sagittal alignment; Systematic review; Spine; Trauma; Functional outcomes
• ISSN: 2666-5484; 2666-5484
• DOI: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2024.100529

•Sagittal alignment is associated with functional outcomes in degenerative disease.•This association is less clear in trauma patients.•We reviewed literature on sagittal alignment as predictors for functional outcomes.•Few papers addressed this topic, and no association was found.•Further research is necessary.
Thoracolumbar spinal fractures (TLSF) can cause pain, neurological deficits, and functional disability. Operative treatments aim to preserve neurological function, improve functional status, and restore spinal alignment and stability. In this review, we evaluate the relationship between spinal alignment and functional impairment in patients with TLSF.
We performed a systematic review in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines to identify full-text articles that evaluate the correlation between spinal alignment and functional outcomes of TLSF. The artificial intelligence software Rayyan assisted the screening process. Functional outcomes referred to activity/disability, quality of life, and pain scores, as well as return to work metrics. Radiological assessments included were vertebral compression angle, Cobb and Gardner angles, sagittal vertical axis, pelvic incidence, and pelvic tilt. Statistical analyses were performed for the data provided by articles using the SPSS v24.
Of 1,616 articles reviewed, 6 were included for final analysis. Only 1 study primarily addressed the effects of spinopelvic parameters and functional outcomes. Four studies correlated Cobb angles with functional outcome, while 3 others compared vertebral compression angles with functional outcomes. Outcomes were assessed using work status or a combination of VAS pain and spine score, ODI, SF-36, and RMDQ-24. Neither the analysis done within the articles, nor the one made with the raw data provided by them, showed a significant correlation between the radiological measurements assessed at time of injury and final functional outcomes.
A correlation between the assessed spinal radiological measurements assessed with the functional outcomes of TLSF was not found in this review. Further well-designed prospective studies are necessary to evaluate spinal alignment measurements in TLSF with functional outcomes.