Transfemoral versus transcarotid access for transcatheter aortic valve replacement

To compare the outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) through a transfemoral (TF) and transcarotid (TC) access at our institution. From January 2014 to January 2020, 62 TC-TAVR and 449 TF-TAVR were performed using 2 prosthesis devices (Edwards SAPIEN 3, n = 369; Medtronic Evolu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:JTCVS techniques Vol. 15; pp. 46 - 53
Main Authors: Olivier, Maud-Emmanuelle, Di Cesare, Alessandro, Poncet, Anne, Brasselet, Camille, Metz, Damien, Biancari, Fausto, Ruggieri, Vito Giovanni, Faroux, Laurent, Muccio, Salvatore, Torossian, Pierre-Frédéric, Duval, Sébastien, Liu, Li, Durand, Emmanuelle, Tassan, Sophie, Heroguelle, Virginie
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier Inc 01-10-2022
Elsevier
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:To compare the outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) through a transfemoral (TF) and transcarotid (TC) access at our institution. From January 2014 to January 2020, 62 TC-TAVR and 449 TF-TAVR were performed using 2 prosthesis devices (Edwards SAPIEN 3, n = 369; Medtronic Evolut R, n = 142). Propensity score matching was used to adjust for imbalance in the baseline characteristics of the study groups. Propensity score matching provided 62 matched pairs with comparable operative risk (mean European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation II, TC-TAVR 7.6% vs TF-TAVR 6.6%, P = .17). Thirty-day mortality (4.8% vs 3.2%, P = 1.00) and 2-year mortality (11.3% vs 12.9%, P = .64) after TC-TAVR were comparable with TF-TAVR. Strokes were numerically more frequent after TC-TAVR compared with TF-TAVR (3.2% vs 0%, P = .23), but the difference did not reach statistical significance. TF-TAVR was associated with a significantly greater risk of permanent pacemaker implantation (29.0% vs 12.9%, P = .04) compared with TC-TAVR. Other complications were not frequent and were similarly distributed between the matched groups. TC access for TAVR was associated with satisfactory results compared to the femoral access. TC-TAVR could be considered a valid and safe alternative to TF-TAVR when femoral access is contraindicated.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Collaborators of the Reims Heart Team Group: Laurent Faroux, MD, Salvatore Muccio, MD, Pierre-Frédéric Torossian, MD, Sébastien Duval, MD, Li Liu, MD, Emmanuelle Durand, MD, Sophie Tassan, MD, and Virginie Heroguelle, MD.
ISSN:2666-2507
2666-2507
DOI:10.1016/j.xjtc.2022.05.019