A Review of the Use of Angiotensin Receptor Blockers for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Events in Patients with Essential Hypertension Without Compelling Indications

OBJECTIVE To review the role of angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) for the prevention of cardiovascular events in patients with essential hypertension without other compelling indications. DATA SOURCES Peer-reviewed clinical trials, review articles, and relevant treatment guidelines were identifie...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Annals of pharmacotherapy Vol. 47; no. 5; pp. 686 - 693
Main Authors: Zaiken, Kathy, Hudd, Timothy R, Cheng, Judy WM
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Los Angeles, CA SAGE Publications 01-05-2013
Whitney
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:OBJECTIVE To review the role of angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) for the prevention of cardiovascular events in patients with essential hypertension without other compelling indications. DATA SOURCES Peer-reviewed clinical trials, review articles, and relevant treatment guidelines were identified from MEDLINE and Current Content database (both 1966-November 15, 2012) using the search terms angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), azilsartan, candesartan, eprosartan, irbesartan, losartan, olmesartan, telmisartan, valsartan, hypertension, myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure, and cardiovascular outcomes. Results were limited to human trials published in English. Citations from articles were also reviewed for additional references. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION The focus was on clinical trials evaluating cardiovascular end points of ARBs used in patients with essential hypertension without compelling indications. DATA SYNTHESIS Data supporting the use of ARBs for reducing cardiovascular events in patients with essential hypertension without compelling indications are inconsistent. To date, only candesartan and losartan have shown a significant reduction in cardiovascular morbidity within this sizable subgroup of patients. In the Study on Cognition and Prognosis in the Elderly (SCOPE) trial, candesartan showed a 27.8% reduction in nonfatal stroke versus placebo (95% CI 1.3–47.2; p = 0.04). Moreover, losartan demonstrated a decrease in all cardiovascular events compared to atenolol in the Cardiovascular Morbidity and Mortality in the Losartan Intervention for Endpoint Reduction in Hypertension (LIFE) study (RR 0.87; 95% CI 0.77–0.98; p = 0.021). CONCLUSIONS Data supporting the use of ARBs for reducing cardiovascular events in patients with essential hypertension without compelling indications are limited and inconclusive. More studies are needed before ARBs can be routinely recommended as first-line therapy for hypertension management in patients without other compelling indications.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Review-1
ISSN:1060-0280
1542-6270
DOI:10.1345/aph.1R273