Positioning of systemic intermediaries in sustainability transitions: Between storylines and speech acts

•We address how systemic intermediaries obtain legitimate roles.•Positioning theory literature is used to uncover emerging modes of governance.•Three systemic intermediaries are studied in agriculture, energy, and healthcare.•Intermediaries need to balance initiating and sustaining innovative system...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Environmental innovation and societal transitions Vol. 36; pp. 485 - 497
Main Authors: van Lente, Harro, Boon, Wouter P.C., Klerkx, Laurens
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier B.V 01-09-2020
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:•We address how systemic intermediaries obtain legitimate roles.•Positioning theory literature is used to uncover emerging modes of governance.•Three systemic intermediaries are studied in agriculture, energy, and healthcare.•Intermediaries need to balance initiating and sustaining innovative systemic changes.•Positioning of intermediaries live on the promise of a field, bringing precarity. How do systemic intermediaries obtain legitimate roles for themselves in innovation systems and transition processes? This is still an understudied question in the study of systemic intermediaries. We start from the observation that roles, or positions, are not given, but emerge in interactions as a negotiated set of rights and obligations. Inspired by positioning theory, which has its roots in symbolic interactionism, we analyse how positions are invoked in the actors’ various actions and statements (‘speech acts’) and how they draw from the mutually constructed narratives (‘storylines’) that enable and constrain the range of possible positions. We analyse, over time, the positioning of three Dutch systemic intermediaries in agriculture, energy production, and healthcare. We conclude that systemic intermediaries move together with the promise of the field and, as a consequence, have to reposition themselves. In different phases, they both profit and suffer from the dilemma between initiating and sustaining innovative systemic changes.
ISSN:2210-4224
2210-4232
DOI:10.1016/j.eist.2020.02.006