RISK AND RETURNS: Large‐scale Funding for Urban Research
The nature of research funding shapes knowledge outcomes, especially for urban research that is conducted in multiple sites and over multiple years. Recent unplanned cuts in the Global Challenges Research Fund (GCRF) grants, alongside the rupture caused by Covid‐19, created ethical and procedural is...
Saved in:
Published in: | International journal of urban and regional research Vol. 47; no. 2; pp. 299 - 304 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Chichester, UK
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
01-03-2023
Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | The nature of research funding shapes knowledge outcomes, especially for urban research that is conducted in multiple sites and over multiple years. Recent unplanned cuts in the Global Challenges Research Fund (GCRF) grants, alongside the rupture caused by Covid‐19, created ethical and procedural issues for completing the PEAK Urban programme. Building on durable partnerships, setting principles for the reduced fund distribution and adjusting modes of working enabled PEAK Urban to navigate the fiscal disruption—but the difficult episode highlights lessons for the ethical organization of global urban research under conditions of uncertainty. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | This paper was completed with support from the PEAK Urban programme of Research Councils UK, supported by UKRI's Global Challenges Research Fund (GCRI) (grant ref ES/P011055/1). No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors. |
ISSN: | 0309-1317 1468-2427 |
DOI: | 10.1111/1468-2427.13146 |