Accounting for violent conflict risk in planetary defense decisions

• Published in: Acta astronautica Vol. 178; pp. 15 - 23
• Main Author: Baum, Seth D.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Elmsford Elsevier Ltd 01-01-2021; Elsevier BV
• Subjects: Alarms; Decisions; Defense; Defense programs; Deflection; Disruption; Explosions; False alarms; Military communications; Near-Earth Objects; Nuclear explosions; Nuclear weapons; Planetary defense; Risk; Risk analysis; Risk management; Space telescopes; Violent conflict; Nuclear weapons; Violent conflict; Risk analysis; Risk management; Planetary defense
• ISSN: 0094-5765; 1879-2030
• DOI: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2020.08.028

This paper provides the first-ever survey of the implications of violent conflict risk for planetary defense program decisions. Arguably, the aim of planetary defense should be to make Earth safer from all threats, including but not limited to threats from near-Earth objects (NEOs). Insofar as planetary defense projects affect other risks besides NEOs, these other risks should be taken into account. This paper evaluates three potential effects of planetary defense programs on violent conflict risk. First, planetary defense may offer a constructive model for addressing a major global risk. By documenting the history of its successes and failures, the planetary defense community can aid efforts to address other global risks, including but not limited to violent conflict. Second, the proposed use of nuclear explosions for NEO deflection and disruption could affect the role of nuclear weapons in violent conflict risk. The effect may be such that nuclear deflection/disruption would increase aggregate risks to human society. However, the effect is difficult to assess, mainly due to ambiguities in violent conflict risk. Third, planetary defense could reduce violent conflict risk by addressing the possibility of NEO collisions being mistaken as violent attacks and inadvertently triggering violent conflict. False alarms mistaken as real attacks are a major concern, especially as a cause of nuclear war. Improved awareness of NEOs and communication between astronomers and military officials could help resolve NEO false alarms. Each of these three effects of planetary defense programs on violent conflict risk can benefit from interaction between the communities that study and address NEO and violent conflict risks.
•This paper assess three implications of violent conflict risk for planetary defense.•First is the value of planetary defense as a model for other global risks.•Second is the use of nuclear explosives for near-Earth object (NEO) deflection.•Third is the possibility of NEO collision being mistaken as a violent attack.