Fracture liaison services in Ireland—how do we compare to international standards?

• Published in: Osteoporosis international Vol. 33; no. 5; pp. 1089 - 1096
• Main Authors: Dockery, F., Glynn, A., Franks, K., Carey, J. J., O’Gradaigh, D., Kenny, P., Askin, D., Butler, E., Sweeney, B., Conlon, B., McGregor, B., Lannon, R., Rooney, B., Pillai, I., Fitzgerald, C.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London Springer London 01-05-2022; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Delivery of Health Care; Endocrinology; Fractures; Hip; Hospitals; Humans; International standards; Ireland - epidemiology; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Original Article; Orthopedics; Osteoporosis; Osteoporosis - complications; Osteoporosis - epidemiology; Osteoporosis - therapy; Osteoporotic Fractures - complications; Osteoporotic Fractures - epidemiology; Osteoporotic Fractures - prevention & control; Patients; Questionnaires; Rheumatology; Secondary Prevention; Trauma; Ireland; FLS; Fracture liaison service; Fractures osteoporosis
• ISSN: 0937-941X; 1433-2965
• DOI: 10.1007/s00198-021-06251-4

Summary
In this first na tional survey of public hospitals in The Republic of Ireland, we found fracture liaison services (FLS) to be heterogeneous, limited in many cases and poorly supported. A national strategy is urgently needed to support the implementation and operation of an FLS, and thus help reduce the burden of fragility fractures for patients and the healthcare system.
Introduction
Fragility/low-trauma fractures are a global concern, whose incidence is rising as the population ages. Many are preventable, and people with a prior fragility fracture are at particularly high risk of further fractures. This patient group is the target of the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) Capture the Fracture campaign, advocating global adoption of fracture liaison services (FLS), with the aim of preventing secondary fragility fractures. We wished to determine the current availability and standards of an FLS in Ireland, ahead of the launch of a National FLS database.
Methods
We devised a questionnaire encompassing the thirteen IOF standards for an FLS and asked all 16 public hospitals with an orthopaedic trauma unit in Ireland, to complete for the calendar year 2019 in patients aged ≥ 50 years.
Results
All sites returned the questionnaire, i.e. 100% response rate. Nine hospitals stated that they have an FLS, additionally one non-trauma hospital running a FLS responded, and were included. These 10 FLS had identified and managed 3444 non-hip fractures in the year 2019. This figure represents 19% of the expected non-hip fragility fracture numbers occurring annually in Ireland. Implementation of the IOF standards was very variable. All sites reported being inadequately resourced to provide a high-quality service necessary to be effective.
Conclusion
The existence and functioning of FLS in Ireland are heterogeneous and suboptimal. A national policy to support the implementation of this programme in line with international standards of patient care is urgently needed.