Patient-centered perinatal palliative care: family birth plans, outcomes, and resource utilization in a diverse cohort

• Published in: American journal of obstetrics & gynecology MFM Vol. 4; no. 6; p. 100725
• Main Authors: Buskmiller, Cara, Ho, Stephanie, Chen, Michelle, Gants, Shavonia, Crowe, Ellen, Lopez, Suzanne
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Elsevier Inc 01-11-2022
• Subjects: congenital anomaly; fetal anomaly; life-limiting condition; patient-centered outcome; perinatal hospice; perinatal palliative care; prenatal diagnosis; life-limiting condition; patient-centered outcome; perinatal palliative care; fetal anomaly; congenital anomaly; perinatal hospice; prenatal diagnosis
• ISSN: 2589-9333; 2589-9333
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2022.100725

Perinatal palliative care is an emerging concept in fetal medicine that offers quality-of-life options and anticipatory grief management for families of fetuses with complex conditions. Few perinatal palliative care outcomes are detailed in peer-reviewed literature.
This study aimed to describe outcomes of perinatal palliative care at the Fetal Center of the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston and Women's Center at Children's Memorial Hermann Hospital.
This was a retrospective cohort of families receiving perinatal palliative care for life-limiting fetal diagnosis, such as trisomy 13 or 18 and some major structural anomalies between 2016 and 2020. The primary outcome was whether delivery events matched families’ birth plans, including fetal/neonatal clinical course matching expectations described by consultant notes. Secondary outcomes included maternal safety outcomes, use of perinatal interventions, delivery outcomes, and resource utilization outcomes.
Of 187 perinatal palliative care consults, delivery events matched families’ plans and clinicians’ expectations in 89% of cases (165/185); 39% (73/187) of families requested some perinatal interventions, 64% of whom planned postnatal comfort care even while choosing antenatal interventions. Demographics and median income were similar between families who chose some interventions and those who chose comfort care. Patients choosing any interventions had more mismatches between their plans and delivery events (19% vs 2%; P<.001), were more likely to change their plans (24% vs 6%; P=.001), and unsurprisingly used more healthcare resources. They were also more likely to have intraamniotic infection or postpartum hemorrhage (9% vs 22%; P=.02), but this was associated with mode of delivery and not choice of interventions.
Most families’ perinatal experiences matched birth plans and expectations in this perinatal palliative care program. Families who desired interventions used more healthcare resources, but often did so with plans for postnatal comfort care, demonstrating insight into neonatal prognosis but achieving value-consistent goals, such as meeting a live neonate. Perinatal palliative care was safe for maternal patients and equitable across racial, ethnic, and income groups. Perinatal palliative care and some perinatal interventions are options for care of the whole family in complex fetal medicine cases.