Small field size dose-profile measurements using gel dosimeters, gafchromic films and micro-thermoluminescent dosimeters

The introduction of mini-multi-leaf collimators (MMLC) into radiotherapy has seen the use of smaller field sizes become increasingly important. Small field sizes that tightly conform to precise target regions are sought in radiotherapy to deliver doses with a high therapeutic ratio. MMLCs have made...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Radiation measurements Vol. 44; no. 3; pp. 249 - 256
Main Authors: Wong, C.J., Ackerly, T., He, C., Patterson, W., Powell, C.E., Qiao, G., Solomon, D.H., Meder, R., Geso, M.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Kidlington Elsevier Ltd 01-03-2009
Elsevier
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The introduction of mini-multi-leaf collimators (MMLC) into radiotherapy has seen the use of smaller field sizes become increasingly important. Small field sizes that tightly conform to precise target regions are sought in radiotherapy to deliver doses with a high therapeutic ratio. MMLCs have made it possible to shrink field sizes in radiotherapy to below half a centimetre. The dosimetry of such fields with conventional dosimeters such as gas-ionisation chambers is not feasible due to limitations caused by the chambers relatively large size compared to the size of the collimated beam. In this work, the dose distribution of radiotherapy beams collimated to such small sizes were examined using polyacrylamide gels dosimeters, Gafchromic films and micro-thermoluminescence dosimeters (micro-TLDs). Dose penumbra widths obtained with gel dosimeters, Gafchormic film and micro-TLDs were generally in agreement with each other, although a wider FWHM of the field was measured with gel in comparison to film. An asymmetric dose distribution between the two axis profiles of a 3 × 3 mm collimated field was observed and can be attributed to an inherent asymmetry of the MMLC.
ISSN:1350-4487
1879-0925
DOI:10.1016/j.radmeas.2009.03.012