In-situ Interprofessional Perinatal Drills: The Impact of a Structured Debrief on Maximizing Training While Sensing Patient Safety Threats

• Published in: Curēus (Palo Alto, CA) Vol. 11; no. 2; p. e4096
• Main Authors: Greer, Joy A, Haischer-Rollo, Gayle, Delorey, Donald, Kiser, Rebecca, Sayles, Timothy, Bailey, Jennifer, Blosser, Colleen, Middlebrooks, Reginald, Ennen, Christopher S
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Cureus Inc 19-02-2019; Cureus
• Subjects: Hemorrhage; Mannequins; Medical Simulation; Morbidity; Mortality; Nursing; Obstetrics; Patient safety; Patient satisfaction; Pediatrics; Premature birth; Simulation; Teams; Training; New York; United States > US; multi-disciplinary; simulation
• ISSN: 2168-8184; 2168-8184
• DOI: 10.7759/cureus.4096

Introduction In-situ interprofessional emergency team training improves participants' with confidence and knowledge and identifies latent safety threats. This study examined the impact of a structured debrief on an interprofessional perinatal team's ability to identify latent safety threats and assess competency in managing perinatal emergencies. It was hypothesized that latent safety threats would be reduced and checklist compliance would increase during subsequent in-situ perinatal team training. Methods Two in-situ training sessions were held six months apart. The perinatal emergency response team provided care for a standardized patient with preterm twin gestation. Each session included off-ward delivery and resuscitation of the first infant, transportation to appropriate inpatient units, cesarean delivery, and resuscitation of the second twin. Postpartum hemorrhage ensued, requiring massive transfusion protocol activation. Medical experts assessed team performance with critical action checklists. A structured debrief identified latent safety threats, developed action plans, and reviewed checklist compliance. Checklist compliance rates were analyzed using a z-ratio test. Results The first training session: seven teams (75 staff) completed 75% (292/391) critical action checklist items and identified 34 latent safety threats. Second training session: four teams (45 staff) completed 89% (94/106) critical action checklist items. Ten latent safety threats were mitigated during the second session. Utilizing a z-ratio, a significant difference was detected between the overall checklist compliance rates of the two sessions, z = -3.069, p = .002. Post-hoc power calculation was <10%. Conclusions In-situ interprofessional perinatal emergency team training is feasible, identifies latent patient safety threats, and may improve team competency.