Development and Validation of the Minnesota Assessment of Pharmacogenomic Literacy (MAPL)

• Published in: Journal of personalized medicine Vol. 12; no. 9; p. 1398
• Main Authors: Allen, Josiah D, Zhang, Lusi, Johnson, Alyssa N K, Jacobson, Pamala A, McCarty, Catherine A, Pittenger, Amy L, Bishop, Jeffrey R
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Switzerland MDPI AG 29-08-2022; MDPI
• Subjects: Clinical outcomes; Factor analysis; Focus groups; Genomics; Health education; Health literacy; Knowledge; Patients; Pharmacogenomics; Precision medicine; Qualitative research; Review boards; Sociodemographics; Statistical analysis; United States > US; Minnesota; genetic counseling; literacy assessment; pharmacogenomics; psychometric validation; genomic literacy
• ISSN: 2075-4426; 2075-4426
• DOI: 10.3390/jpm12091398

Ensuring that patients have an adequate understanding of pharmacogenomic (PGx) test results is a critical component of implementing precision medicine into clinical care. However, no PGx-specific validated literacy assessment has yet been developed. To address this need, we developed and validated the Minnesota Assessment of Pharmacogenomic Literacy (MAPLTM). Foundational work included a scoping review of patient and general public attitudes and experiences with pharmacogenomic testing, three focus groups, readability assessments, and review by experts and members of the general public. This resulted in a 15-item assessment designed to assess knowledge in four domains: underlying concepts, limitations, benefits, and privacy. For validation, 646 participants completed the MAPL as a part of a larger survey about pharmacogenomic research and statewide PGx implementation. Two items were deemed to be “too easy” and dropped. The remaining 13 items were retained in the final MAPL with good internal reliability (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.75). Confirmatory factor analysis validated the four-domain construct of MAPL and suggested good model performance and high internal validity. The estimated coefficient loadings across 13 questions on the corresponding domains are all positive and statistically significant (p < 0.05). The MAPL covers multiple knowledge domains of specific relevance to PGx and is a useful tool for clinical and research settings where quantitative assessment of PGx literacy is of value.