Curated Collections for Educators: Five Key Papers about Receiving Feedback in Medical Education

• Published in: Curēus (Palo Alto, CA) Vol. 11; no. 9; p. e5728
• Main Authors: Natesan, Sreeja, Stehman, Christine, Shaw, Rebecca, Story, David, Krzyzaniak, Sara M, Gottlieb, Michael
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Cureus Inc 23-09-2019; Cureus
• Subjects: Emergency medical care; Emergency Medicine; Experts; Feedback; Medical Education; Medicine; Social networks; Teachers; United States > US; feedback; formative assessment; medical education; post-graduate medical education; receiving feedback; curated collection; modified delphi method
• ISSN: 2168-8184; 2168-8184
• DOI: 10.7759/cureus.5728

Introduction Feedback is a complex, multi-component interaction that is essential for academic development and advancement. Successful feedback requires active involvement from both the giver and receiver. However, research and guidance on the subject mostly center on the role of the provider of feedback. But the receiver of feedback holds the true power in this interaction, choosing how to interpret the information and deciding whether or not to incorporate the feedback to instill behavioral change. In this article, the authors aim to summarize five key papers related to receiving feedback, in order to outline both relevant information for emerging clinician-educators and discern ways to use this information for faculty development. Methods In order to generate a list of key papers that describe the importance of receiving feedback, the authors conducted a consensus-building process informed by social media sources. Key articles on receiving feedback were aggregated through a literature search. This list was further augmented via an open call on Twitter for important papers regarding receiving feedback. Through these processes, a list of 43 papers was created on the topic of receiving feedback in medical education. After compiling this preliminary list, the authorship group engaged in a modified Delphi approach to build consensus on selecting papers that best described the process of receiving feedback. Results We present the group's five most highly rated papers on the topic of receiving feedback in medical education. These papers were deemed essential and have also been summarized based on their relevance to junior faculty members and faculty developers. Conclusion While giving and receiving feedback are both vital for growth and development, much of the research focuses solely on giving feedback. However, receiving feedback is equally, if not more, important for instilling change in the learner. We explore the power of receiving feedback in medical education through five key papers that analyze the subject. We believe these papers can serve as great learning resources for both junior faculty members and faculty developers. They can assist the junior faculty to cultivate the ability to receive feedback and also serve as resources to aid senior faculty in building faculty-development sessions.