Turkey's ambivalent self: ontological insecurity in 'Kemalism' versus 'Erdoğanism'

• Published in: Cambridge review of international affairs Vol. 32; no. 3; pp. 263 - 282
• Main Authors: Gülsah Çapan, Zeynep, Zarakol, Ayşe
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Cambridge Routledge 04-05-2019; Taylor & Francis Ltd
• Subjects: 20th century; Ambivalence; Erdogan, Recep Tayyip; Insecurity; Justice; Modernity; Modernization; Narratives; Ontology; Political parties; Populism; Security; Turkey
• ISSN: 0955-7571; 1474-449X
• DOI: 10.1080/09557571.2019.1589419

This article aims to understand the 'non-Western self' and the different ways its ontological insecurity can manifest, through the example of Turkey, by contrasting Kemalism's modernizing vision with Erdoğan's current populism. We argue that the constructions of political narratives in Turkey (and by implication in other similar settings) derive from two interrelated aspects of the spatio-temporal hierarchies of (colonial) modernity: structural insecurity and temporal insecurity. Modern Turkey's ontological insecurity was constructed spatially, on the one hand, as liminality and structural in-betweenness, and temporally, on the other, as lagging behind the modernization of the West. After discussing how Kemalism offered to deal with such insecurities in the twentieth century, we analyse the Justice and Development Party (AKP) period of the twenty-first century as an alternative attempted answer to these problems and explain why efforts to dismantle the Kemalist framework collapsed into its populist mirror image. The example of the Turkish case underlines the importance of focusing on the different ways in which the structural and temporal insecurities of 'the non-Western self' take shape at a given point and manner of entry into the modern international order.