Use of collaborative funding to implement the Remedial Action Plan for the St. Louis River Area of Concern, Minnesota, USA

• Published in: Aquatic ecosystem health & management Vol. 21; no. 4; pp. 409 - 420
• Main Authors: French, N. T., Dekker, T., Hartig, J. H.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: East Lansing Taylor & Francis 02-10-2018; Michigan State University
• Subjects: Area; Beneficial use; Codification; Collaboration; contaminated sediment remediation; Contamination; Environmental impact; Estuaries; Estuarine dynamics; Estuarine environments; Fluvial sediments; Frameworks; Funding; Great Lakes Restoration Initiative; habitat restoration; Identification; Iron and steel making; Lake Superior; Lakes; Lumber; Mining; Restoration; Rivers; Sediments; Shipbuilding; Shipping; Water pollution; Water quality; United States > US; Minnesota
• ISSN: 1463-4988; 1539-4077
• DOI: 10.1080/14634988.2018.1527136

In the late 1800s and early 1900s, collaborative funding by some of the nation's leading tycoons led to development of Duluth, Minnesota and the surrounding area. This included Andrew Carnegie, Jay Cooke, Andrew Mellon, J. P. Morgan and John D. Rockefeller, to name a few. This tremendous period of growth and expansion included major industrial developments, including grain, lumber, iron mining, manufacturing, rail, shipping and shipbuilding, and associated development of the frontier. Although critical to the development of a vital community, these activities took a toll through unchecked alteration of natural habitat and contamination of St. Louis River estuary sediments. These adverse legacy impacts, which occurred well before the establishment of our current environmental regulatory framework, became well recognized in 1985 when the International Joint Commission's Great Lakes Water Quality Board identified the St. Louis River as an Area of Concern requiring the development and implementation of a remedial action plan to restore all impaired beneficial uses. This commitment to Remedial Action Plans was then codified in the 1987 Protocol to the U.S.-Canada Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement. The initial Stage 1 Remedial Action Plans for the St Louis River Area of Concern was completed in 1992 with the initial Stage 2 Remedial Action Plan completed in 1995, followed by periodic updates through 2012. However, these updates did not have budgets and action timelines necessary to secure the financial commitments to implement identified actions. Establishment of the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative in 2010 led to the 2013 Remedial Action Plan update (i.e. Stage 2 Remedial Action Plan) that included a business plan that identified specific actions, timelines, and budget estimates. Minnesota began implementing recommendations utilizing collaborative funding through a partnership approach. Ninety-nine percent of the actions identified in the Remedial Action Plan have been completed or are currently underway. Funding needs and sources have been clearly identified and the project is on track to complete major actions by 2020 and remove all beneficial use impairments and delist as an Area of Concern, dependent upon confirmation of use restoration, by 2025.