Adaptive Centroidal Voronoi Tessellation With Agent Dropout and Reinsertion for Multi-Agent Non-Convex Area Coverage

Voronoi diagrams are widely used for area partitioning and coverage control. Nevertheless, their utilization in non-convex domains often necessitates additional computational procedures, such as diffeomorphism application, geodesic distance calculations, or the integration of local markers. Extendin...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:IEEE access Vol. 12; pp. 5503 - 5516
Main Authors: Lee, Kangneoung, Lee, Kiju
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Piscataway The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) 2024
IEEE
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Voronoi diagrams are widely used for area partitioning and coverage control. Nevertheless, their utilization in non-convex domains often necessitates additional computational procedures, such as diffeomorphism application, geodesic distance calculations, or the integration of local markers. Extending these techniques across diverse non-convex domains proves challenging. This paper introduces the adaptive centroidal Voronoi tessellation ([Formula Omitted]CVT) algorithm, which combines iterative centroidal Voronoi tessellation ([Formula Omitted]CVT) with an innovative agent dropout and reinsertion strategy. This integration aims to enhance area coverage control in non-convex domains while maintaining adaptability across varied environments without the need for complex computational processes. The efficacy of this approach is validated through simulations involving non-convex domains with disjoint target areas, obstacles, and shape constraints for both homogeneous and heterogeneous agents. Additionally, the [Formula Omitted]CVT algorithm is extended for real-time coverage control scenarios. Performance metrics are employed to assess the distribution of partitioned Voronoi regions and the overall coverage of the target areas. Results demonstrate improved performance compared to methods that do not incorporate the agent dropout and reinsertion strategy.
ISSN:2169-3536
2169-3536
DOI:10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3351052