The crucial role of criterion A: A response to Maier's commentary
We thank Maier for his thoughtful comments (this issue, pp. 925–926) and appreciate the opportunity to further explicate our views regarding the Criterion A problem. According to Maier, the obvious conclusion to be drawn from our article (Weathers & Keane, 2007) is that Criterion A should be eli...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Journal of traumatic stress Vol. 20; no. 5; pp. 917 - 919 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , |
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Germantown
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company
01-10-2007
|
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | We thank Maier for his thoughtful comments (this issue, pp. 925–926) and appreciate the opportunity to further explicate our views regarding the Criterion A problem. According to Maier, the obvious conclusion to be drawn from our article (Weathers & Keane, 2007) is that Criterion A should be eliminated. We believe the opposite, given the current conceptual and empirical status of the posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) construct. |
|---|---|
| Bibliography: | istex:4767D1DBC24743D309DFBC8426C56775638B25D2 ark:/67375/WNG-53MB0Z6F-G ArticleID:JTS20297 |
| ISSN: | 0894-9867 1573-6598 |
| DOI: | 10.1002/jts.20297 |