Mutant libraries reveal negative design shielding proteins from supramolecular self-assembly and relocalization in cells

Understanding the molecular consequences of mutations in proteins is essential to map genotypes to phenotypes and interpret the increasing wealth of genomic data. While mutations are known to disrupt protein structure and function, their potential to create new structures and localization phenotypes...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS Vol. 119; no. 5
Main Authors: Garcia Seisdedos, Hector, Levin, Tal, Shapira, Gal, Freud, Saskia, Levy, Emmanuel D
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: United States National Academy of Sciences 01-02-2022
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Understanding the molecular consequences of mutations in proteins is essential to map genotypes to phenotypes and interpret the increasing wealth of genomic data. While mutations are known to disrupt protein structure and function, their potential to create new structures and localization phenotypes has not yet been mapped to a sequence space. To map this relationship, we employed two homo-oligomeric protein complexes in which the internal symmetry exacerbates the impact of mutations. We mutagenized three surface residues of each complex and monitored the mutations' effect on localization and assembly phenotypes in yeast cells. While surface mutations are classically viewed as benign, our analysis of several hundred mutants revealed they often trigger three main phenotypes in these proteins: nuclear localization, the formation of puncta, and fibers. Strikingly, more than 50% of random mutants induced one of these phenotypes in both complexes. Analyzing the mutant's sequences showed that surface stickiness and net charge are two key physicochemical properties associated with these changes. In one complex, more than 60% of mutants self-assembled into fibers. Such a high frequency is explained by negative design: charged residues shield the complex from self-interacting with copies of itself, and the sole removal of the charges induces its supramolecular self-assembly. A subsequent analysis of several other complexes targeted with alanine mutations suggested that such negative design is common. These results highlight that minimal perturbations in protein surfaces' physicochemical properties can frequently drive assembly and localization changes in a cellular context.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
1H.G.S. and T.L. contributed equally to this work.
Edited by David Baker, Institute for Protein Design, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; received January 22, 2021; accepted November 16, 2021
Author contributions: H.G.S. and E.D.L. designed research; H.G.S., T.L., G.S., and S.F. performed research; H.G.S., T.L., and E.D.L. analyzed data; and H.G.S. and E.D.L. wrote the paper.
ISSN:0027-8424
1091-6490
DOI:10.1073/pnas.2101117119