Management dilemma in penetrating head injuries in comatose patients: Scenario in underdeveloped countries

• Published in: Surgical neurology international Vol. 3; no. 1; p. 89
• Main Authors: Wani, Abrar Ahad, Ramzan, Altaf Umar, Dar, Tanveer Iqbal, Malik, Nayil K, Khan, Abdul Quyoom, Wani, Mohd Afzal, Alam, Shafeeq, Nizami, Furqan A
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Scientific Scholar 01-01-2012; Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
• Subjects: Original; comatose; missile; Brain injury; outcome
• ISSN: 2152-7806; 2229-5097; 2152-7806
• DOI: 10.4103/2152-7806.99930

The optimal management of patients with minimal injury to brain has been a matter of controversy and this is especially intensified when the patient has a poor neurological status. This is important in the regions where neurosurgical services are limited and patient turnover is disproportionate to the available resources. We aimed to determine the effectiveness of aggressive management in coma patients after penetrating missile injuries of the brain.
All the patients of gunshots or blast injuries were included if they had a Glasgow Coma Scale score of less than 8 after initial resuscitation and had no other injury that could explain their poor neurological status. The indication for emergency surgery was evidence of a mass lesion causing a significant mass effect; otherwise, debridement was done in a delayed fashion. The patients who were not operated were those with irreversible shock or having small intracranial pellets with no significant scalp wounds. The patients who had a Glasgow outcome score of 1, 2, or 3 were classified as having an unfavorable outcome (UO) and those with scores 4 and 5 were classified as having a favorable outcome (FO).
We operated 13 patients and the rest 13 were managed conservatively. The characteristics of the patients having a favorable outcome were young age (OR = 28, P = 0 .031), normal hemodynamic status (OR = 18, P = 0.08), presence of pupillary reaction (OR = 9.7, P = 0.1), and injury restricted to one hemisphere only (OR = 15, P = 0.07). All of the patients who were in shock after resuscitation died while 25% of the patients with a normal hemodynamic status had a favorable outcome.
In developing countries with limited resources, the patients who are in a comatose condition after sustaining penetrating missile injuries should not be managed aggressively if associated with bihemispheric damage, irreversible shock, or bilateral dilated nonreacting pupils. This is especially important in the event of receiving numerous patients with the same kind of injuries.