Point of care guided coagulation management in adult patients on ECMO: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Despite the advancements in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) technology, balancing the prevention of thrombosis and the risk of bleeding in patients on ECMO is still a significant challenge for physicians. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of critical care Vol. 83; p. 154830 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
United States
Elsevier Inc
01-10-2024
Elsevier Limited |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Despite the advancements in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) technology, balancing the prevention of thrombosis and the risk of bleeding in patients on ECMO is still a significant challenge for physicians. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of viscoelastic point-of-care (POC)-guided coagulation management in adult patients on ECMO.
PubMed Medline, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were searched. After quality assessment, meta-analysis was carried out using random effects model, heterogeneity using I2 and publication bias using Doi and Funnel plots.
A total of 1718 records were retrieved from the searches. Fifteen studies that enrolled a total of 583 participants met the inclusion criteria. Of those, 3 studies enrolling 181 subjects were eligible for meta-analysis. In patients managed with POC-guided algorithms, the odds were coherently lower for bleeding (OR 0.71, 95%CI 0.36–1.42), thrombosis (OR 0.91, 95%CI 0.32–2.60), and in-hospital mortality (OR 0.54, 95%CI 0.29–1.03), but not for circuit change or failure (OR 1.50, 95%CI 0.59–3.83). However, the differences were not statistically significant due to wide 95%CIs.
Viscoelastic POC monitoring demonstrates potential benefits for coagulation management in ECMO patients. Future research should focus on standardizing evidence to improve clinical decision-making.
The protocol was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) with registration ID CRD42023486294.
[Display omitted]
•Balancing thrombosis and bleeding remains a significant challenge in ECMO management.•Point-of-care (POC) viscoelastic management shows a trend toward reduced bleeding and thrombosis events.•POC-guided strategies demonstrate potential benefits for coagulation management in ECMO patients.•Future research should focus on standardizing evidence to improve clinical decision-making. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-3 |
ISSN: | 0883-9441 1557-8615 1557-8615 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jcrc.2024.154830 |