Scanning for transcription factor binding by a variant EMSA

Detection of in vitro protein-DNA interaction is one of many investigational analyses for transcription factor regulation of gene promoters. The electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) has proven widely popular in this respect by integrating individual techniques (protein isolation, nucleic acid...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) Vol. 585; p. 147
Main Authors: Gurevich, Igor, Zhang, Carmen, Aneskievich, Brian J
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: United States 01-01-2010
Subjects:
Online Access:Get more information
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Detection of in vitro protein-DNA interaction is one of many investigational analyses for transcription factor regulation of gene promoters. The electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) has proven widely popular in this respect by integrating individual techniques (protein isolation, nucleic acid radiolabeling, and gel electrophoresis) into one protocol. However, relatively short DNA oligomers are often used which in many cases presupposes what one sequence out of a promoter of possibly thousands of base pairs is the candidate region interacting with a transcription factor. This can be an experimentally distressing situation when multiple putative binding sites of less than perfect consensus may be present making selection of any one or even a few potential sites uncertain or when one is seeking improved throughput as opposed to a one factor:one oligomer approach for in vitro testing of algorithm-predicted binding sites. We describe here our use and refinement of a variant EMSA that can employ multiple and relatively long (up to 1000 bp) probes of promoter sequence in one binding reaction for interaction with nuclear proteins in general and individual transcription factors in particular. We provide labeling and electrophoresis methods suitable for such probes and also highlight the mobility shift differences one can expect with the variant probe method.
ISSN:1940-6029
DOI:10.1007/978-1-60761-380-0_11