Evaluation of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol equations by cross-platform assessment of accuracy-based EQA data against SI-traceable reference value

• Published in: Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine Vol. 61; no. 10; p. 1808
• Main Authors: Tan, Hwee Tong, Yong, Sharon, Liu, Hong, Liu, Qinde, Teo, Tang Lin, Sethi, Sunil Kumar
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Germany 26-09-2023
• Subjects: Cardiovascular Diseases - diagnosis; Cholesterol, HDL; Cholesterol, LDL; Humans; Reference Values; Triglycerides; Friedewald equation; Martin/Hopkins equation; low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDLC); Sampson equation; beta-quantitation; isotope-dilution mass spectrometry
• ISSN: 1437-4331
• DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2022-1301

Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDLC) is the primary cholesterol target for the diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Although beta-quantitation (BQ) is the gold standard to determine LDLC levels accurately, many clinical laboratories apply the Friedewald equation to calculate LDLC. As LDLC is an important risk factor for CVD, we evaluated the accuracy of Friedewald and alternative equations (Martin/Hopkins and Sampson) for LDLC.
We calculated LDLC based on three equations (Friedewald, Martin/Hopkins and Sampson) using the total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDLC) in commutable serum samples measured by clinical laboratories participating in the Health Sciences Authority (HSA) external quality assessment (EQA) programme over a 5 years period (number of datasets, n=345). LDLC calculated from the equations were comparatively evaluated against the reference values, determined from BQ-isotope dilution mass spectrometry (IDMS) with traceability to the International System of Units (SI).
Among the three equations, Martin/Hopkins equation derived LDLC had the best linearity against direct measured (y=1.141x - 14.403; R
=0.8626) and traceable LDLC (y=1.1692x - 22.137; R
=0.9638). Martin/Hopkins equation (R
=0.9638) had the strongest R
in association with traceable LDLC compared with the Friedewald (R
=0.9262) and Sampson (R
=0.9447) equation. The discordance with traceable LDLC was the lowest in Martin/Hopkins (median=-0.725%, IQR=6.914%) as compared to Friedewald (median=-4.094%, IQR=10.305%) and Sampson equation (median=-1.389%, IQR=9.972%). Martin/Hopkins was found to result in the lowest number of misclassifications, whereas Friedewald had the most numbers of misclassification. Samples with high TG, low HDLC and high LDLC had no misclassification by Martin/Hopkins equation, but Friedewald equation resulted in ∼50% misclassification in these samples.
The Martin/Hopkins equation was found to achieve better agreement with the LDLC reference values as compared to Friedewald and Sampson equations, especially in samples with high TG and low HDLC. Martin/Hopkins derived LDLC also enabled a more accurate classification of LDLC levels.