Comparison of liquid chromatography instruments with single quadrupole and tandem mass spectrometry for trace level analysis: Aflatoxin m1 (afm1) in white cheese

Although the mycological content of white cheese has been extensively studied, little data is available concerning the existence of aflatoxin M1 (AFM 1 ) in Egyptian white cheese. Egyptian legislation does not allow for AFM 1 in milk or milk products. In this study, trace amounts of AFM 1 contaminat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of food properties Vol. 20; no. sup2; pp. 2294 - 2304
Main Authors: Kamel, Essam, Bazalou, Mohamed, Sdeek, Fayza A, Konuk, Muhsin
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Abingdon Taylor & Francis 29-12-2017
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Although the mycological content of white cheese has been extensively studied, little data is available concerning the existence of aflatoxin M1 (AFM 1 ) in Egyptian white cheese. Egyptian legislation does not allow for AFM 1 in milk or milk products. In this study, trace amounts of AFM 1 contamination were detected in laboratory manufactured Egyptian white cheese using either single or triple quadrupole techniques after artificial exposure of AFM 1 to raw milk used for the cheese making. Validation data proved that the triple quadrupole method was more sensitive and selective than the single quadrupole method for AFM 1 analysis. The limit of detection (LOD) and the limit of quantification (LOQ) were 0.0625 ppb and 0.125 ppb for the triple quadrupole method and 0.125 ppb and 0.250 ppb for the single quadrupole method. Recovery of AFM 1 ranged from 87% to 92% for single quadrupole and 89% to 99% for triple quadrupole using mass spectrometer techniques. Linear regression produced linear standard curves with coefficients of determination of regression of 0.9981 and 1.000 for the single and triple quadruples, respectively. Although both methods were able to measure AFM 1 , the tandem mass spectrometer produced results that were more reliable.
ISSN:1094-2912
1532-2386
DOI:10.1080/10942912.2017.1369435