A mechanistic model for calcite crystal growth using surface speciation

A new mechanistic model for the crystal growth kinetics of calcite is presented, accounting for the presence of various surface complexes. Calcite crystal growth rates were determined with the constant composition method at Ω c (calcite supersaturation) values of 1.5–9.8. In general the rate increas...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Geochimica et cosmochimica acta Vol. 63; no. 2; pp. 217 - 225
Main Authors: Nilsson, Ö, Sternbeck, J
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier Ltd 1999
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:A new mechanistic model for the crystal growth kinetics of calcite is presented, accounting for the presence of various surface complexes. Calcite crystal growth rates were determined with the constant composition method at Ω c (calcite supersaturation) values of 1.5–9.8. In general the rate increases with Ω c, but variations in CO 2 partial pressures and the (CO 3 2−)/(Ca 2+) ratio also have a major effect on the crystal growth rate. These effects are eliminated by assuming that calcite crystal growth proceeds through three reversible reactions, in which CaCO 3 0(aq) and Ca 2+(aq) are incorporated at specific surface complexes. The model derived rates closely follow the experimental rates over the entire experimental range ( r = 0.996, n = 23). The obtained rate constants indicate that CaCO 3 0(aq) is ≈20 times more reactive than Ca 2+(aq) at the calcite-water interface. This agrees with the fact that dehydration of metal ions precedes crystal growth and, in analogy with other metal-ligand complexes, the CO 3 2− ligand will increase the rate of water exchange of Ca. This model is a modified version of a rhodochrosite crystal growth model (Sternbeck, 1997) which allows for the comparison of reaction mechanisms and rate constants. The rate constants for incorporation of CaCO 3 0(aq) at the mineral surface are 55 to 270 times higher than for MnCO 3 0(aq). This difference can not likely be explained by the water exchange rates, but may be due to the fact that ligand exchange mechanisms for Ca and Mn differ.
ISSN:0016-7037
1872-9533
DOI:10.1016/S0016-7037(99)00026-5