Primary care-based screening and recruitment for an adolescent depression prevention trial: Contextual considerations during a youth mental health crisis

• Published in: Implementation research and practice Vol. 5; p. 26334895241246203
• Main Authors: Knepper, Amanda K, Feinstein, Rebecca T, Sanchez-Flack, Jennifer, Fitzgibbon, Marian, Lefaiver, Cheryl, McHugh, Ashley, Gladstone, Tracy R G, Van Voorhees, Benjamin W
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States SAGE Publications 01-01-2024; SAGE Publishing
• Subjects: Implementation Research and Practice in the COVID Context; implementation evaluation; inner context; outer context; children/child and adolescent/youth/family; qualitative methods; prevention
• ISSN: 2633-4895; 2633-4895
• DOI: 10.1177/26334895241246203

Rising rates of adolescent depression in the wake of COVID-19 and a youth mental health crisis highlight the urgent need for accessible mental healthcare and prevention within primary care. Digital mental health interventions (DMHIs) may increase access for underserved populations. However, these interventions are not well studied in adolescents, nor healthcare settings. The purpose of this study was to identify barriers and facilitators to screening and recruitment activities for
, a multi-site adolescent depression prevention trial comparing two digital prevention programs within four diverse health systems in two U.S. states.
This qualitative study is a component of a larger Hybrid Type I trial. We conducted semi-structured key informant interviews with clinical and non-clinical implementers involved with screening and recruitment for the P2P trial. Informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), interviews were conducted at the midpoint of the trial to identify barriers, facilitators, and needed adaptations, and to gather information on determinants that may affect future implementation.
Respondents perceived the P2P trial as valuable, well aligned with the mission of their health systems. However, several barriers were identified, many of which stemmed from influences outside of the healthcare settings. Universal and site-specific outer setting influences (COVID-19 pandemic, youth mental health crisis, local community conditions) interacted with Inner Setting and Innovation domains to create numerous challenges to the implementation of screening and recruitment.
Our findings emphasize the need for ongoing, comprehensive assessment of dynamic inner and outer setting contexts prior to and during implementation of clinical trials, as well as flexibility for adaptation to unique clinical contexts. The CFIR is useful for assessing determinants during times of rapid inner and outer setting change, such as those brought on by the COVID-19 pandemic, youth mental health crisis, and the corresponding exacerbation of resource strain within healthcare settings.
PATH 2 Purpose: Primary Care and Community-Based Prevention of Mental Disorders in Adolescents https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04290754.