Endurance Running Training Individually Guided by HRV in Untrained Women

• Published in: Journal of strength and conditioning research Vol. 33; no. 3; pp. 736 - 746
• Main Authors: da Silva, Danilo F, Ferraro, Zachary M, Adamo, Kristi B, Machado, Fabiana A
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Copyright by the National Strength & Conditioning Association 01-03-2019; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Ovid Technologies
• Subjects: Adolescent; Adult; Athletes; Autonomic Nervous System - physiology; Endurance; Exercise Test; Female; Heart rate; Heart Rate - physiology; High-Intensity Interval Training - methods; Humans; Parasympathetic nervous system; Running; Running - physiology; Sports training; Time Factors; Young Adult
• ISSN: 1064-8011; 1533-4287
• DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002001

ABSTRACTda Silva, DF, Ferraro, ZM, Adamo, KB, and Machado, FA. Endurance running training individually guided by HRV in untrained women. J Strength Cond Res 33(3)736–746, 2019—The aim of this study was to analyze the effects of heart rate variability (HRV)-guided training compared with a standardized prescription on (a) time to complete 5-km running performance (t5km), (b) peak treadmill running speed (Vpeak) and its time limit (tlim at Vpeak), and (c) autonomic cardiac modulation (i.e., parasympathetic activity and recovery) in untrained women. Additionally, we correlated changes in t5km with changes in Vpeak, tlim at Vpeak and autonomic cardiac modulation. Thirty-six untrained women were divided into a HRV-guided training group (HRVG) and a control group (CG). The CG followed a predefined program, alternating moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) and high-intensity interval training (HIIT). The determination of MICT or HIIT was based on the pretraining HRV for HRVG. MICT was performed if HRV was <mean − 1 SD of previous measures. Otherwise, HIIT was prescribed. The t5km, Vpeak, tlim at Vpeak, parasympathetic activity (i.e., rMSSD) and parasympathetic reactivation (i.e., HRR) were measured before and after the training period. The t5km decreased to a greater magnitude in the HRVG (−17.5 ± 5.6% vs. −14 ± 4.7%; Effect Size (ES) between-group difference = moderate). rMSSD and tlim at Vpeak only improved in HRVG (+23.3 ± 27.8% and +23.6 ± 31.9%, respectively). The HRVG experienced greater improvements in Vpeak and HRR (Vpeak10 ± 7.3% vs. 8.2 ± 4.7%; HRR19.1 ± 28.1% vs. 12.6 ± 12.9%; ES between-group difference = small). Although HRVG performed less MICT than CG, the volume of MICT was negatively related to changes in t5km. Vpeak changes were highly correlated with t5km changes. The greater improvements in HRVG for t5km and autonomic modulation reinforce the potential application of this tool.