Alternative growth functions for predicting body, carcass, and breast weight in ducks: Lomolino equation and extreme value function

• Published in: Poultry science Vol. 93; no. 4; pp. 1031 - 1042
• Main Authors: Faridi, A, Murawska, D, Golian, A, Mottaghitalab, M, Gitoee, A, Lopez, S, France, J
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England 01-04-2014
• Subjects: Animal Husbandry - methods; Animals; Body Weight; Ducks - growth & development; Ducks - physiology; Female; Male; Meat - analysis; Models, Biological; Pectoralis Muscles - growth & development; Pectoralis Muscles - physiology; growth function; Lomolino equation; duck; extreme value function
• ISSN: 0032-5791
• DOI: 10.3382/ps.2013-03375

In this study, 2 alternative growth functions, the Lomolino and the extreme value function (EVF), are introduced and their ability to predict body, carcass, and breast weight in ducks evaluated. A comparative study was carried out of these equations with standard growth functions: Gompertz, exponential, Richards, and generalized Michaelis-Menten. Goodness of fit of the functions was evaluated using R(2), mean square error, Akaike information criterion, and Bayesian information criterion, whereas bias factor, accuracy factor, Durbin-Watson statistic, and number of runs of sign were the criteria used for analysis of residuals. Results showed that predictive performance of all functions was acceptable, though the Richards and exponential equations failed to converge in a few cases for both male and female ducks. Based on goodness-of-fit statistics, the Richards, Gompertz, and EVF were the best equations whereas the worst fits to the data were obtained with the exponential. Analysis of residuals indicated that, for the different traits investigated, the least biased and the most accurate equations were the Gompertz, EVF, Richards, and generalized Michaelis-Menten, whereas the exponential was the most biased and least accurate. Based on the Durbin-Watson statistic, all models generally behaved well and only the exponential showed evidence of autocorrelation for all 3 traits investigated. Results showed that with all functions, estimated final weights of males were higher than females for the body, carcass, and breast weight profiles. The alternative functions introduced here have desirable advantages including flexibility and a low number of parameters. However, because this is probably the first study to apply these functions to predict growth patterns in poultry or other animals, further analysis of these new models is suggested.