The last 50 years in growth theory and the next 10

This article offers a personal view of the main achievements of (broadly) neoclassical growth theory, along with a few of the important gaps that remain. It discusses briefly the pluses and minuses of two major recent lines of research: endogenous growth theory and the drawing of causal inferences f...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Oxford review of economic policy Vol. 23; no. 1; pp. 3 - 14
Main Author: Solow, Robert M.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Oxford Oxford University Press 01-04-2007
OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS
Oxford Publishing Limited (England)
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This article offers a personal view of the main achievements of (broadly) neoclassical growth theory, along with a few of the important gaps that remain. It discusses briefly the pluses and minuses of two major recent lines of research: endogenous growth theory and the drawing of causal inferences from international cross-sections, and criticizes the widespread contemporary tendency to convert the normative Ramsey model into a positive representative-agent macroeconomic model applying at all frequencies. Finally, it comments on the articles appearing in this symposium.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/HXZ-1JN7G181-T
istex:591E4DB5520B2B44C46EA72ACD72A7BEA0515740
ArticleID:grm004
ISSN:0266-903X
1460-2121
DOI:10.1093/oxrep/grm004