The last 50 years in growth theory and the next 10
This article offers a personal view of the main achievements of (broadly) neoclassical growth theory, along with a few of the important gaps that remain. It discusses briefly the pluses and minuses of two major recent lines of research: endogenous growth theory and the drawing of causal inferences f...
Saved in:
Published in: | Oxford review of economic policy Vol. 23; no. 1; pp. 3 - 14 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Oxford
Oxford University Press
01-04-2007
OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS Oxford Publishing Limited (England) |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | This article offers a personal view of the main achievements of (broadly) neoclassical growth theory, along with a few of the important gaps that remain. It discusses briefly the pluses and minuses of two major recent lines of research: endogenous growth theory and the drawing of causal inferences from international cross-sections, and criticizes the widespread contemporary tendency to convert the normative Ramsey model into a positive representative-agent macroeconomic model applying at all frequencies. Finally, it comments on the articles appearing in this symposium. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ark:/67375/HXZ-1JN7G181-T istex:591E4DB5520B2B44C46EA72ACD72A7BEA0515740 ArticleID:grm004 |
ISSN: | 0266-903X 1460-2121 |
DOI: | 10.1093/oxrep/grm004 |