Critical theory and praxis in post-apartheid South Africa: the case for a critical criminology

The obsession with empirical work in South African criminology has led to a neglect of ‘context’ in the form of skimming over structural oppressions, such as racism, inequality, poverty and unemployment, as if they were not potently criminogenic societal factors. With regard to analysing so-called c...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Acta academica (Bloemfontein, South Africa) Vol. 52; no. 2; pp. 106 - 130
Main Author: Lötter, Casper
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: University of the Free State 01-12-2020
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The obsession with empirical work in South African criminology has led to a neglect of ‘context’ in the form of skimming over structural oppressions, such as racism, inequality, poverty and unemployment, as if they were not potently criminogenic societal factors. With regard to analysing so-called conventional crime, the aforementioned ‘context’ is an extremely important consideration in a country teeming with these structural oppressions. Contributions from both Critical Theory and Marxist-inspired criminology could correct this imbalance. Following the backdrop of such a discussion, this paper will examine the phenomenon of the prison industrial complex, both in the US and, more particularly, in the local setting. The argument will then conclude with a three-pronged assessment, namely 1) an evaluation of the debt which Marxist-inspired criminologists (Jeffery Reiman, Angela Davis and Richard Quinney) owe to the Frankfurt School, 2) an overview of the relevant ideas from Critical Theory, and, 3) the application of conflict criminology supplemented by scholarly work in the tradition of the Frankfurt School (represented by Habermas and Žižek) to South African conditions.
ISSN:0587-2405
2415-0479
2415-0479
DOI:10.18820/24150479/aa52i2/6