Comprehension and recall of information about factors associated with peri‐implantitis: A randomized controlled trial

• Published in: Journal of periodontology (1970) Vol. 93; no. 1; pp. 89 - 99
• Main Authors: Monje, Alberto, Pérez, Alva, Vera‐Rodriguez, Maria, Nart, José, Catena, Andrés, Petrova, Dafina
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States 01-01-2022
• Subjects: Comprehension; dental hygiene; Dental Implants - adverse effects; Humans; implantology; Peri-Implantitis - chemically induced; periodontitis; Prospective Studies; Risk Factors; implantology; dental hygiene; periodontitis
• ISSN: 0022-3492; 1943-3670
• DOI: 10.1002/JPER.21-0018

Background
To evaluate the effect of different communication strategies on comprehension and recall of information about factors associated to peri‐implantitis.
Methods
A prospective, randomized controlled trial was conducted in consecutive patients diagnosed with peri‐implantitis. The sample was divided into three groups according to the communication strategy used: Test group 1—Written communication via leaflet with visual aids (L‐VA); Test group 2—Written communication via leaflet with no visual aids (L‐NVA); and control group—only verbal communication with no leaflet (NL). A questionnaire assessing comprehension at baseline (T0) and recall at 3 months (T1) and 6 months (T2) was administered following the fuzzy trace theory with a combination of 11 “gist” and seven “verbatim” items. The “health belief model” dimensions were further examined to test the influence of the communication strategy upon perceived severity, susceptibility, benefits, barriers, self‐efficacy, and behavioral intentions.
Results
Ninety‐nine patients that fulfilled the eligibility criteria were included. Gist and verbatim comprehension of the control, risk factors, and preventive measures for peri‐implantitis overall was significantly greater in the test groups, in particular in L‐VA at T0 (n = 99). Nevertheless, recall was not influenced by the communication strategy at T1 (n = 85) or T2 (n = 78). No significant differences were noted between groups or as a function of time for any of the “health belief model” constructs with the sole exception of perceived barriers (P = 0.045), which proved lower in the test groups.
Conclusion
The comprehension of information about factors associated to peri‐implantitis can be efficiently improved by using written communicative strategies, in particular when supplemented with visual aids. Nevertheless, this approach failed to show effectiveness in modulating recall or in changing behavioral intentions over follow‐up (NCT04543604).