Healthcare quality during pediatric mental health boarding: A qualitative analysis

• Published in: Journal of hospital medicine Vol. 17; no. 10; pp. 783 - 792
• Main Authors: McCarty, Emily J., Nagarajan, Meera K., Halloran, Sean R., Brady, Robert E., House, Samantha A., Leyenaar, JoAnna K.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Hoboken Frontline Medical Communications 01-10-2022
• Subjects: Health care delivery; Mental health; Quality improvement
• ISSN: 1553-5592; 1553-5606
• DOI: 10.1002/jhm.12906

Background
Following initial evaluation and management, youth requiring inpatient psychiatric care often experience boarding, defined as being held in the emergency department or another location while awaiting inpatient care. Although mental health boarding is common, little research has examined the quality of healthcare delivery during the boarding period.
Objective
This study aimed to explore the perspectives and experiences of multidisciplinary clinicians and parents regarding mental health boarding and to develop a conceptual model to inform quality improvement efforts.
Design, Setting, & Participants
We conducted semistructured interviews with clinicians and parents of youth experiencing boarding. Interviews focused on experiences of care and perceived opportunities for improvement were continued until thematic saturation was reached. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed to identify emergent themes using a general inductive approach. Axial coding was used to inform conceptual framework development.
Results
Interviews were conducted with 19 clinicians and 11 parents. Building on the Donabedian structure‐process‐outcome model of quality evaluation, emergent domains, and associated themes included: (1) infrastructure for healthcare delivery, including clinician training, healthcare team composition, and the physical environment; (2) processes of healthcare delivery, including clinician roles and responsibilities, goals of care, communication with families, policies/procedures, and logistics of inter‐facility transfer; and (3) measurable outcomes, including patient safety, family experience, mental health status, timeliness of care, and clinician moral distress.
Conclusion
This qualitative study summarizes clinician and family perspectives about care for youth experiencing boarding. The conceptual model resulting from this analysis can be applied to implement and evaluate quality improvement endeavors to support this vulnerable population.