Limited Capacity for Aedes aegypti to Mechanically Transmit Chikungunya Virus and Dengue Virus

Mechanical transmission is an understudied mode of arbovirus transmission that occurs when a biting insect transmits virus among hosts by the direct transfer of virus particles contaminating its mouthparts. Multiple arboviruses have been shown to be capable of utilizing this transmission route, but...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene Vol. 107; no. 6; pp. 1239 - 1241
Main Authors: Bransfield, Angela B, Misencik, Michael J, Brackney, Doug E, Armstrong, Philip M
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: United States Institute of Tropical Medicine 14-12-2022
The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Mechanical transmission is an understudied mode of arbovirus transmission that occurs when a biting insect transmits virus among hosts by the direct transfer of virus particles contaminating its mouthparts. Multiple arboviruses have been shown to be capable of utilizing this transmission route, but most studies were conducted 40 to 70 years ago using dated methodologies. To gain a better understanding of this phenomenon, we used molecular techniques to evaluate the efficiency of mechanical transmission by Aedes aegypti mosquitoes for two evolutionarily divergent arboviruses, chikungunya virus (CHIKV) and dengue virus (DENV). Viral RNA and/or infectious DENV could be detected on 13.8% of mosquito proboscises sampled immediately after an infectious bloodmeal, but positivity rates declined within hours. CHIKV RNA and/or infectious virus was detected on 38.8% of proboscises immediately after feeding but positivity rates dropped to 2.5% within 4 hours. RNA copy numbers were low for both viruses, and we were unable to demonstrate mechanical transmission of CHIKV using an established animal model, suggesting that this mode of transmission is unlikely under natural conditions.
Bibliography:These authors contributed equally to this work.
Financial support: This research was supported by grant no. 1R01AI148477-01A1 from the National Institutes of Health.
Authors’ addresses: Angela B. Bransfield and Michael J. Misencik, Center for Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases, Department of Environmental Sciences, The Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station, New Haven, Connecticut, E-mails: angela.bransfield@ct.gov and michael.misencik@ct.gov. Doug E. Brackney and Philip M. Armstrong, Center for Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases, Department of Environmental Sciences, The Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station, New Haven, Connecticut, and Department of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases, Yale School of Public Health, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, E-mails: doug.brackney@ct.gov and philip.armstrong@ct.gov.
ISSN:0002-9637
1476-1645
DOI:10.4269/ajtmh.22-0323