Blameworthiness as Deserved Guilt

• Published in: The journal of ethics Vol. 21; no. 1; pp. 89 - 115
• Main Author: Carlsson, Andreas Brekke
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Dordrecht Springer 01-03-2017; Springer Netherlands; Springer Nature B.V; Springer Publishing Company
• Subjects: Education; Emotions; Ethics; Morality; Philosophy; Political Philosophy; Moral responsibility; Blame; Desert; Guilt
• ISSN: 1382-4554; 1572-8609
• DOI: 10.1007/s10892-016-9241-x

It is often assumed that we are only blameworthy for that over which we have control. In recent years, however, several philosophers have argued that we can be blameworthy for occurrences that appear to be outside our control, such as attitudes, beliefs and omissions. This has prompted the question of why control should be a condition on blameworthiness. This paper aims at defending the control condition by developing a new conception of blameworthiness: To be blameworthy, I argue, is most fundamentally to deserve to feel guilty. Being blamed by someone else is not necessarily harmful to the wrongdoer. The blame might not be expressed, or the wrongdoer might not care. But to blame oneself necessarily involves suffering. This conception of blameworthiness explains why the control condition should obtain: We are morally blameworthy for A only if A was (directly or indirectly) under our control because (a) to be blameworthy is to deserve to feel guilty, (b) to feel guilty is to suffer, and (c) one deserves to suffer for A only if A was under one's control.