Do we need to perform cystoscopy on all adults attending urology centres as outpatients?
There has been considerable expansion in the use of flexible cystoscopy (FC) and people who can perform the procedure. Hence, there is a criticism that this procedure is being overused with no management benefit. We audited the use of FC in a district hospital for a period of 1 year. The results of...
Saved in:
Published in: | Urologia internationalis Vol. 73; no. 3; p. 198 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Switzerland
01-01-2004
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get more information |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | There has been considerable expansion in the use of flexible cystoscopy (FC) and people who can perform the procedure. Hence, there is a criticism that this procedure is being overused with no management benefit.
We audited the use of FC in a district hospital for a period of 1 year. The results of FC for non-standard indications (other than haematuria and check cystoscopy) were analysed for their diagnostic yield.
Of the 1,390 FCs performed, 295 were done for non-standard indications. 46.14% of these cystoscopies had positive findings. Cancer detection rate was 6.10%. Cystoscopy altered the management in 14.08% of patients and was supportive to diagnosis and management in 32.06%.
This procedure is certainly not overused and the ever-increasing requirement of this simple procedure has serious resource implications for the National Health Service. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0042-1138 |
DOI: | 10.1159/000080827 |