Comparative Analysis of Four Baseflow Separation Methods in the South Atlantic-Gulf Region of the U.S

• Published in: Water (Basel) Vol. 12; no. 1; p. 120
• Main Authors: Chen, Hao, Teegavarapu, Ramesh
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Basel MDPI AG 01-01-2020
• Subjects: Anthropogenic factors; Aquatic environment; baseflow; baseflow index (bfi); baseflow separation methods; Climate change; Comparative analysis; Creeks & streams; Drought; Droughts; Floods; Gaging; Groundwater; Groundwater management; Hydrologic data; Hydrology; Management; Mass balance; Methods; Precipitation; Protection and preservation; Runoff; Separation; south atlantic-gulf (sag) region; Stream discharge; Stream flow; Streamflow; Sustainable development; Trends; United States; Water; Water management; Water protection; Water quality; Water quality management; Water shortages; Water supply; Water, Underground; Watershed management; Watersheds; United States; Florida; United States > US
• ISSN: 2073-4441; 2073-4441
• DOI: 10.3390/w12010120

Baseflow estimation and evaluation are two critical and essential tasks for water quality and quantity, drought management, water supply, and groundwater protection. Observed baseflows are rarely available and are limited to focused pilot studies. In this study, an exhaustive evaluation of four different baseflow separation methods (HYSEP, WHAT, BFLOW, and PART) using surrogates of observed baseflows estimated with the conductivity mass balance (CMB) method is carried out using data from several streamflow gauging sites from the South Atlantic-Gulf (SAG) region comprised of nine states in the Southeastern U.S. Daily discharge data from 75 streamflow gauging sites for the period 1970–2013, located in the least anthropogenically affected basins in the SAG region were used to estimate the baseflow index (BFI), which quantifies the contribution of baseflow from streamflows. The focus of this study is to compare the four different baseflow separation methods and calibrate and validate these methods using CMB method based estimates of baseflows to evaluate the variation of BFI values derived from these methods. Results from the study suggest that the PART and HYSEP methods provide the highest and lowest average BFI values of 0.62 and 0.52, respectively. Similarities in BFI values estimated from these methods are noted based on a strong correlation between WHAT and BFLOW. The highest BFI values were found in April in the eastern, western, and central parts of the SAG region, and the highest contribution of baseflow to the streamflow was noted in October in the southern region. However, the lowest BFI values were noted in the month of September in all regions of SAG. The calibrated WHAT method using data from the CMB method provides the highest correlation as noted by the coefficient of determination. This study documents an exhaustive and comprehensive evaluation of baseflow separation methods in the SAG region, and results from this work can aid in the selection of the best method based on different metrics reported in this study. The use of the best method can aid in the short and long term management of low flows at a regional level that supports a sustainable aquatic environment and mitigates the effects of droughts effectively.