The Instructor's Role in a Model-Based Inquiry Laboratory: Characterizing Instructor Supports and Intentions in Teaching Authentic Scientific Practices

• Published in: CBE life sciences education Vol. 21; no. 1; p. ar9
• Main Authors: Cooper, A. C, Southard, K. M, Osness, J. B, Bolger, M. S
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States American Society for Cell Biology 01-03-2022
• Subjects: Active Learning; Authentic Learning; Biology; College Faculty; Comparative Analysis; Curriculum; Decision Making; Engineering - education; General s and; Humans; Inquiry; Intention; Laboratory Experiments; Mathematics; Research Training; Science Instruction; Science Process Skills; Scientific Research; Students; Teacher Attitudes; Teacher Role; Teaching; Teaching Methods; Undergraduate Students
• ISSN: 1931-7913; 1931-7913
• DOI: 10.1187/cbe.21-07-0177

Limited access to undergraduate research experiences for science, technology, engineering, and mathematics students has led to creation of classroom-based opportunities for students to participate in authentic science. Revising laboratory courses to engage students in the practices of science has been shown to have many benefits for students. However, the instructor's role in successful implementation of authentic-inquiry curricula requires further investigation. Previous work has demonstrated that navigating an instructional role within the open-ended format of an inquiry curriculum is challenging for instructors. Little is known about effective strategies for supporting students in authentic scientific practices. To address this challenge, we investigated instructors with prior experience teaching Authentic Inquiry through Modeling in Biology (AIM-Bio) in order to reveal strategies that are likely to help students succeed in this context. We took a unique approach that uncovered how instructors supported students and how they intended to support students in the scientific practices of modeling and experimental design. Analysis included in vivo recordings of instructor-student interactions paired with instructor interviews over the course of a semester. Findings detail the ways in which instructors flexibly responded to students through their in-the-moment actions. Additionally, the instructor intentions provided crucial explanatory power to explain the rationale behind teaching choices made.