Reasoning in the Monty Hall problem: Examining choice behaviour and probability judgements

This research examined choice behaviour and probability judgement in a counterintuitive reasoning problem called the Monty Hall problem (MHP). In Experiments 1 and 2 we examined whether learning from a simulated card game similar to the MHP affected how people solved the MHP. Results indicated that...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Thinking & reasoning Vol. 9; no. 1; pp. 67 - 90
Main Authors: Franco-Watkins, Ana, Derks, Peter, Dougherty, Michael
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Basingstoke Taylor & Francis Group 01-02-2003
Taylor & Francis
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This research examined choice behaviour and probability judgement in a counterintuitive reasoning problem called the Monty Hall problem (MHP). In Experiments 1 and 2 we examined whether learning from a simulated card game similar to the MHP affected how people solved the MHP. Results indicated that the experience with the card game affected participants' choice behaviour, in that participants selected to switch in the MHP. However, it did not affect their understanding of the objective probabilities. This suggests that there is dissociation between implicit knowledge gained from the task and the explicit understanding as to why switching was the best strategy. In Experiment 3, the number of prizes and doors were manipulated to examine how participants construed the problem space of the MHP. Results revealed that participants partition the probability judgement to reflect the number of prizes over the number of unopened doors.
ISSN:1354-6783
1464-0708
DOI:10.1080/13546780244000114