Prevalence and management of prolapse of the ileoanal pouch

• Published in: Diseases of the colon & rectum Vol. 47; no. 6; pp. 885 - 888
• Main Authors: EHSAN, Mitra, ISLER, John T, KIMMINS, Mark H, BILLINGHAM, Richard P
• Format: Conference Proceeding Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Secaucus, NJ Springer 01-06-2004; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Ovid Technologies
• Subjects: Biological and medical sciences; Colonic Pouches - adverse effects; Colonic Pouches - statistics & numerical data; Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen; Health Surveys; Humans; Intestinal Diseases - epidemiology; Intestinal Diseases - etiology; Intestinal Diseases - surgery; Medical sciences; North America - epidemiology; Prevalence; Proctocolectomy, Restorative - adverse effects; Proctocolectomy, Restorative - statistics & numerical data; Prolapse; Reoperation; North America; Prolapsus; Clinical management; Prevalence; Management; Epidemiology; Gastroenterology
• ISSN: 0012-3706; 1530-0358
• DOI: 10.1007/s10350-004-0511-5

Known late complications of ileal pouch-anal anastomoses include chronic pouchitis, poor pouch function, or stricture. These may jeopardize the pouch and may require pouch salvage procedures. Prolapse of the ileoanal pouch is a little-known complication infrequently noted in the literature. The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of this problem and identify approaches used to correct it and salvage the pouch.
The literature was reviewed for publications describing the diagnosis and treatment of patients with ileoanal pouch prolapse. A survey inquiring about experience with ileoanal pouch prolapse was sent to all North American members and fellows of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons. The survey assessed the number of years that the respondent had been performing ileal pouch-anal anastomoses and the number and type of pouches constructed. The respondents indicated the prevalence of patients with ileoanal pouch prolapse in their practices and length of time from pouch creation to onset of prolapse. They also were asked to indicate presenting symptoms, need for and method of surgical repair, and outcome.
Two hundred and sixty-nine responses were received (response rate, 19.5 percent). Thirty-five respondents indicated that they had assisted in the care of a total of 83 patients with prolapse of the ileoanal pouch. Prolapse symptoms included external prolapse of tissue, sense of obstructed defecation, seepage, and pain. Patients with pouch prolapse most commonly presented within two years of pouch construction. Fifty-two patients required surgery and were managed by a combination of transanal repair, abdominal pouchpexy, and transabdominal revision or removal. The ileoanal pouch was salvaged in all but one case.
Although the incidence of pouch prolapse is relatively low in this survey, the number of cases reported far exceeds the previous known experience. The possibility of this clinical entity should be considered in the differential diagnosis of ileoanal pouch dysfunction. Such recognition should lead to correction of prolapse and pouch salvage in the great majority of patients.