Outcomes After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Quadriceps Tendon in Adolescent Athletes at Mean Follow-up of 4 Years

• Published in: Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine Vol. 12; no. 7; p. 23259671241254795
• Main Authors: Dadoo, Sahil, Herman, Zachary J., Nazzal, Ehab M., Drain, Nicholas P., Finger, Logan, Reddy, Rajiv P., Miller, Liane, Lesniak, Bryson P., Musahl, Volker, Hughes, Jonathan D.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Los Angeles, CA SAGE Publications 01-07-2024; Sage Publications Ltd
• Subjects: Patients; general; knee ligaments; ACL; quadriceps tendon; adolescent athletes
• ISSN: 2325-9671; 2325-9671
• DOI: 10.1177/23259671241254795

Background:
Despite increasing use of quadriceps tendon (QT) autograft in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR), limited data exist regarding its outcomes in high-risk adolescent athletes.
Purpose:
To (1) report the outcomes after QT ACLR in adolescent athletes and (2) identify patient-related and surgery-related factors that may influence failure rates after QT ACLR.
Study Design:
Case series; Level of evidence, 4.
Methods:
All patients aged 14 to 17 years who underwent primary anatomic, transphyseal, single-bundle QT ACLR between 2010 and 2021 with a minimum 2-year follow-up were included for analysis. Demographic and surgical data as well as preoperative International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Marx activity scores were collected retrospectively. All patients were also contacted to assess postoperative patient-reported outcomes (PROs), including IKDC and Marx activity scores, and return-to-sports (RTS) data. Outcomes of interest included rates of revision ACLR and ipsilateral complications, contralateral ACL tears, difference in pre- and postoperative PROs, and rates of RTS. Patient and surgical characteristics were compared between groups who required revision ACLR versus those who did not.
Results:
A total of 162 patients met inclusion criteria, of which 89 adolescent athletes (mean age 16.2 ± 1.1 years, 64% female) were included for analysis at mean follow-up of 4.0 years. Postoperative IKDC scores were significantly higher than preoperative scores (88.5 vs 37.5; P < .001), whereas Marx activity scores decreased postoperatively (14.3 vs 12.2; P = .011). Successful RTS occurred in 80% of patients at a mean time of 9.7 ± 6.9 months, and 85% of these patients returned to the same or higher level of sports. The most common reasons for failure to RTS included lack of time (n = 7, 70%) and fearing reinjury in the operative knee (n = 5, 50%). The overall revision ACLR rate was 10% (n = 9), and contralateral ACL tears occurred in 14% (n = 12) of patients. The overall ipsilateral knee reoperation rate was 22.5% (n = 20). No statistically significant differences in patient or surgical characteristics were observed between patients who underwent revision ACLR and those who did not.
Conclusion:
At a minimum 2-year follow-up after QT ACLR, adolescent athletes experienced significantly improved postoperative IKDC scores, high rates of RTS, and low rates of graft failure, despite a relatively high ipsilateral reoperation rate. Surgeons may utilize this information when identifying the optimal graft choice for adolescent athletes who have sustained an ACL injury and wish to return to high level of sporting activities.