Waiting for redress: Child sexual abuse survivors' experiences of Australia's National Redress Scheme

• Published in: Child abuse & neglect Vol. 129; p. 105657
• Main Authors: Cortis, Natasha, Katz, Ilan
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Elsevier Ltd 01-07-2022; Elsevier Science Ltd
• Subjects: Ambivalence; Australia; Child Abuse; Child abuse & neglect; Child sexual abuse; Children; Compensation; Counseling; Innovations; Institutional abuse; Negative experiences; Older children; Pedophilia; Polls & surveys; Procedural justice; Redress schemes; Responses; Retraumatisation; Sex crimes; Sexual Abuse; Survivor; Survivors; Uncertainty; Victims of crime; Australia; Institutional abuse; Retraumatisation; Australia; Redress schemes; Survivors
• ISSN: 0145-2134; 1873-7757
• DOI: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2022.105657

Governments in multiple countries have established redress schemes to acknowledge institutional responsibility for child maltreatment; to provide survivors with access to compensation, counselling and apologies; and to prompt better practice to prevent child maltreatment. Establishing a National Redress Scheme was recommended by Australia's Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse. The Scheme commenced in 2018 and will run for a decade.
This study sought to understand the ways survivors have experienced applying for redress under the National Redress Scheme, and how Scheme processes could be improved for survivors.
Participants were 322 survivors of child sexual abuse who had applied for redress or considered doing so during the first two years of the Scheme's operation. Two thirds (68%) were aged 55 or over and over half (55%) were men.
To provide feedback about their experiences and perceptions of the National Redress Scheme, participants completed closed and open-ended survey questions.
Only a minority rated the Scheme as either good (16%) or very good (11%). Survey comments provide insight into the ways waiting has contributed to survivors' negative experiences of the Scheme. Survivors waited for the Scheme to be established, for institutions to opt-in, for decisions, and for direct personal responses. Waiting compounded uncertainty and was retraumatising for survivors. Some avoided seeking redress due to likely delays and risks of retraumatisation.
Australia's National Redress Scheme is an ambivalent policy innovation which can both facilitate support and exacerbate harm. The design of redress schemes should pre-emptively address their potential to generate harm, including by recognising that rapid responses are essential to procedural justice, and particularly important for older survivors of child sexual abuse.