Lung transplant airway complications treated with biodegradable airway stents: The Dutch multi‐center experience

Introduction Treatment of post lung‐transplant airway complications is challenging, and treatment with conventional airway stents is associated with adverse events. More recently, biodegradable airway stents (BDS) have been introduced and may be used to reduce these adverse events. In this study we...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Clinical transplantation Vol. 38; no. 3; pp. e15289 - n/a
Main Authors: Pel, Roel, Gan, Tji, Daniels, Johannes M. A., Ruigrok, Dieuwertje, Hellemons, Merel E., Klooster, Karin, Slebos, Dirk‐Jan
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Denmark 01-03-2024
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Introduction Treatment of post lung‐transplant airway complications is challenging, and treatment with conventional airway stents is associated with adverse events. More recently, biodegradable airway stents (BDS) have been introduced and may be used to reduce these adverse events. In this study we explore the feasibility of treatment with BDS post lung transplant. Methods All patients treated with BDS in The Netherlands were included in this retrospective multicenter study. Feasibility, life span of the stent, occurrence of adverse events, and evolution of lung function were evaluated. Results Twelve patients (six malacia and six stenosis) received a total of 57 BDS, ranging from 1 to 10 BDS per patient. Six patients had been pretreated with conventional airway stents. Median stent life span was 112 days (range 66–202). No adverse events occurred during stent placement. In 5 out of 57 stent placements, a single additional bronchoscopy was necessary because of mucus accumulation (n = 4) or excessive granulation tissue (n = 1). All stent naïve patients became airway stent independent after treatment; all patients pretreated with conventional airway stents were still airway stent dependent at the end of follow up. Conclusion Treatment with BDS is safe and feasible. Adverse events were mild and easily treatable. All patients with initial treatment with BDS were airway stent independent at the end of follow up with a median treatment of 4 BDS.
Bibliography:IRB number: METc 2022/185, Clinical trials number: NCT05334199.
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0902-0063
1399-0012
1399-0012
DOI:10.1111/ctr.15289