Stress Distribution after Installation of Fixed Frameworks with Marginal Gaps over Angled and Parallel Implants: A Photoelastic Analysis

Purpose: The objective of this work was to compare by photoelastic analysis the stress distribution along a fixed framework placed over angled or parallel implants with different gap values between the framework and one of the implants. Materials and Methods: Two photoelastic models were created: (i...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of prosthodontics Vol. 16; no. 2; pp. 117 - 122
Main Authors: Markarian, Roberto Adrian, Ueda, Cristiane, Sendyk, Claudio Luiz, Laganá, Dalva Cruz, Souza, Roberto Martins
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Malden, USA Blackwell Publishing Inc 01-03-2007
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Abstract Purpose: The objective of this work was to compare by photoelastic analysis the stress distribution along a fixed framework placed over angled or parallel implants with different gap values between the framework and one of the implants. Materials and Methods: Two photoelastic models were created: (i) with parallel implants; (ii) with a 30° angled central implant. In both cases, three implants were used, and CP titanium frameworks were constructed with commercial components. A plane polariscope was used to observe the photoelastic fringes generated after initial framework assembly, and also when an axial load of 100 N was applied over the central implant. For both models, stress analysis was conducted on well‐fitting frameworks and on another with a 150 μm vertical gap between the framework and the central implant. Results: The photoelastic analysis indicated that in the model with parallel implants, stress distribution followed the implant axis, and in the model with an angled implant, a higher and nonhomogeneous stress concentration was observed around the apical region of the lateral implants. The placement of an ill‐fitting framework resulted in increased preload stress patterns. Conclusion: Stresses were generated after screw tightening of the frameworks, increasing when a load was applied and when a vertical gap was present. Angled implants resulted in oblique stress patterns, which were not transferred with homogeneity to the polymeric model.
AbstractList Purpose : The objective of this work was to compare by photoelastic analysis the stress distribution along a fixed framework placed over angled or parallel implants with different gap values between the framework and one of the implants. Materials and Methods : Two photoelastic models were created: (i) with parallel implants; (ii) with a 30° angled central implant. In both cases, three implants were used, and CP titanium frameworks were constructed with commercial components. A plane polariscope was used to observe the photoelastic fringes generated after initial framework assembly, and also when an axial load of 100 N was applied over the central implant. For both models, stress analysis was conducted on well‐fitting frameworks and on another with a 150 μm vertical gap between the framework and the central implant. Results : The photoelastic analysis indicated that in the model with parallel implants, stress distribution followed the implant axis, and in the model with an angled implant, a higher and nonhomogeneous stress concentration was observed around the apical region of the lateral implants. The placement of an ill‐fitting framework resulted in increased preload stress patterns. Conclusion : Stresses were generated after screw tightening of the frameworks, increasing when a load was applied and when a vertical gap was present. Angled implants resulted in oblique stress patterns, which were not transferred with homogeneity to the polymeric model.
PURPOSEThe objective of this work was to compare by photoelastic analysis the stress distribution along a fixed framework placed over angled or parallel implants with different gap values between the framework and one of the implants.MATERIALS AND METHODSTwo photoelastic models were created: (i) with parallel implants; (ii) with a 30 degrees angled central implant. In both cases, three implants were used, and CP titanium frameworks were constructed with commercial components. A plane polariscope was used to observe the photoelastic fringes generated after initial framework assembly, and also when an axial load of 100 N was applied over the central implant. For both models, stress analysis was conducted on well-fitting frameworks and on another with a 150 microm vertical gap between the framework and the central implant.RESULTSThe photoelastic analysis indicated that in the model with parallel implants, stress distribution followed the implant axis, and in the model with an angled implant, a higher and nonhomogeneous stress concentration was observed around the apical region of the lateral implants. The placement of an ill-fitting framework resulted in increased preload stress patterns.CONCLUSIONStresses were generated after screw tightening of the frameworks, increasing when a load was applied and when a vertical gap was present. Angled implants resulted in oblique stress patterns, which were not transferred with homogeneity to the polymeric model.
Purpose: The objective of this work was to compare by photoelastic analysis the stress distribution along a fixed framework placed over angled or parallel implants with different gap values between the framework and one of the implants. Materials and Methods: Two photoelastic models were created: (i) with parallel implants; (ii) with a 30° angled central implant. In both cases, three implants were used, and CP titanium frameworks were constructed with commercial components. A plane polariscope was used to observe the photoelastic fringes generated after initial framework assembly, and also when an axial load of 100 N was applied over the central implant. For both models, stress analysis was conducted on well‐fitting frameworks and on another with a 150 μm vertical gap between the framework and the central implant. Results: The photoelastic analysis indicated that in the model with parallel implants, stress distribution followed the implant axis, and in the model with an angled implant, a higher and nonhomogeneous stress concentration was observed around the apical region of the lateral implants. The placement of an ill‐fitting framework resulted in increased preload stress patterns. Conclusion: Stresses were generated after screw tightening of the frameworks, increasing when a load was applied and when a vertical gap was present. Angled implants resulted in oblique stress patterns, which were not transferred with homogeneity to the polymeric model.
The objective of this work was to compare by photoelastic analysis the stress distribution along a fixed framework placed over angled or parallel implants with different gap values between the framework and one of the implants. Two photoelastic models were created: (i) with parallel implants; (ii) with a 30 degrees angled central implant. In both cases, three implants were used, and CP titanium frameworks were constructed with commercial components. A plane polariscope was used to observe the photoelastic fringes generated after initial framework assembly, and also when an axial load of 100 N was applied over the central implant. For both models, stress analysis was conducted on well-fitting frameworks and on another with a 150 microm vertical gap between the framework and the central implant. The photoelastic analysis indicated that in the model with parallel implants, stress distribution followed the implant axis, and in the model with an angled implant, a higher and nonhomogeneous stress concentration was observed around the apical region of the lateral implants. The placement of an ill-fitting framework resulted in increased preload stress patterns. Stresses were generated after screw tightening of the frameworks, increasing when a load was applied and when a vertical gap was present. Angled implants resulted in oblique stress patterns, which were not transferred with homogeneity to the polymeric model.
Author Sendyk, Claudio Luiz
Souza, Roberto Martins
Markarian, Roberto Adrian
Laganá, Dalva Cruz
Ueda, Cristiane
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Roberto Adrian
  surname: Markarian
  fullname: Markarian, Roberto Adrian
  organization: MSc Program, Department of Prosthodontics, University of São Paulo School of Dentistry, Brazil
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Cristiane
  surname: Ueda
  fullname: Ueda, Cristiane
  organization: MSc Program, Department of Prosthodontics, University of São Paulo School of Dentistry, Brazil
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Claudio Luiz
  surname: Sendyk
  fullname: Sendyk, Claudio Luiz
  organization: Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, University of São Paulo School of Dentistry, Brazil
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Dalva Cruz
  surname: Laganá
  fullname: Laganá, Dalva Cruz
  organization: Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, University of São Paulo School of Dentistry, Brazil
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Roberto Martins
  surname: Souza
  fullname: Souza, Roberto Martins
  organization: Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Polytechnic School of the University of São Paulo, Brazil
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17362421$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqNkd9u0zAYxS00xP7AKyBfcZdgO4kTI3FRDVqKylbG2HZnfUmczZ0TF9ul7Rvw2LhrNW7xjT_Zv3Msn3OKjgY7KIQwJSmN6_0ipUXGkioXdykjpEwJoZymmxfo5PniKM6kEInI6d0xOvV-ESFaVPQVOqZlxlnO6An68yM45T3-pH1wul4FbQcMXVAOTwcfwBh4OrIdHuuNavHYQa_W1j16vNbhAX8Dd68HMHgCS4_t7ygcDfcmkjC0eA4uWiiDp_3SwBD8BzzC8wcbrDLgg24iDGbrtX-NXnZgvHpz2M_Qz_Hn6_MvyexyMj0fzZImY4QmTVsITqpSKcZLzijwghad4HlHsxY4lIyBECIjnJO6yztOWSM6ypu6VaRuVHaG3u19l87-WikfZK99o-I_B2VXXpaElQXNqwhWe7Bx1nunOrl0uge3lZTIXQtyIXdhy13YcteCfGpBbqL07eGNVd2r9p_wEHsEPu6BtTZq-9_G8uvl_CpOUZ_s9bE1tXnWg3uUvMzKQt5eTOTN7ObqIr_9Lq-zv20XqYo
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1097_SCS_0b013e3182085401
crossref_primary_10_1563_AAID_JOI_D_11_00066
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1708_8208_2010_00323_x
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prosdent_2016_06_011
crossref_primary_10_1097_SCS_0b013e3181acdb81
crossref_primary_10_1177_0954411916653623
crossref_primary_10_1590_0103_6440201302112
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jbiomech_2011_03_032
crossref_primary_10_1097_SCS_0000000000001194
crossref_primary_10_17567_ataunidfd_461225
crossref_primary_10_1097_SCS_0b013e31820f3473
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_aanat_2014_12_001
crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjinnov_2019_000358
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_aanat_2014_03_005
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_coms_2011_02_002
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_optlaseng_2016_03_022
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1708_8208_2010_00311_x
crossref_primary_10_1177_0954411916676192
crossref_primary_10_1563_AAID_JOI_D_12_00260
crossref_primary_10_1563_AAID_JOI_D_12_00200
crossref_primary_10_1590_1807_3107BOR_2014_vol28_0051
crossref_primary_10_1590_1516_1439_010815
crossref_primary_10_3390_app5041350
crossref_primary_10_1097_SCS_0b013e3181a28a96
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prostr_2016_06_161
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cden_2011_07_007
crossref_primary_10_1093_jom_ufab030
crossref_primary_10_1111_cid_12134
crossref_primary_10_1097_SCS_0b013e3182074571
Cites_doi 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1998.090408.x
10.1016/S0022-3913(99)70109-5
10.1097/00008505-200009030-00006
10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70246-X
10.1016/S0021-9290(00)00089-0
10.1067/mpr.2002.127401
ContentType Journal Article
DBID BSCLL
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
AAYXX
CITATION
7X8
DOI 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2007.00161.x
DatabaseName Istex
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
CrossRef
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
CrossRef
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList CrossRef
MEDLINE - Academic

MEDLINE
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: ECM
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=cmedm&site=ehost-live
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Dentistry
EISSN 1532-849X
EndPage 122
ExternalDocumentID 10_1111_j_1532_849X_2007_00161_x
17362421
JOPR161
ark_67375_WNG_VLVRN4WQ_T
Genre article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal Article
Comparative Study
GroupedDBID ---
.3N
.GA
.Y3
05W
0R~
10A
1OB
1OC
29L
31~
33P
34H
3SF
4.4
50Y
50Z
51W
51X
52M
52N
52O
52P
52S
52T
52U
52V
52W
52X
5GY
5HH
5LA
5VS
66C
702
7PT
8-0
8-1
8-3
8-4
8-5
8UM
930
A03
AAESR
AAEVG
AAHHS
AANLZ
AAONW
AASGY
AAXRX
AAZKR
ABCQN
ABCUV
ABEML
ABJNI
ABPVW
ABQWH
ABXGK
ACAHQ
ACBWZ
ACCFJ
ACCZN
ACGFS
ACGOF
ACMXC
ACPOU
ACPRK
ACSCC
ACXBN
ACXQS
ADBBV
ADBTR
ADEOM
ADIZJ
ADKYN
ADMGS
ADOZA
ADXAS
ADZMN
AEEZP
AEIGN
AEIMD
AEQDE
AEUQT
AEUYR
AFBPY
AFEBI
AFFNX
AFFPM
AFGKR
AFPWT
AFZJQ
AHBTC
AHEFC
AHMBA
AIACR
AITYG
AIURR
AIWBW
AJBDE
ALAGY
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALUQN
AMBMR
AMYDB
ASPBG
ATUGU
AVWKF
AZBYB
AZFZN
AZVAB
BAFTC
BDRZF
BFHJK
BHBCM
BMXJE
BROTX
BRXPI
BSCLL
BY8
C45
CAG
COF
CS3
CWXXS
D-E
D-F
DC6
DCZOG
DPXWK
DR2
DRFUL
DRMAN
DRSTM
EBD
EBS
EJD
F00
F01
F04
F5P
FEDTE
FUBAC
G-S
G.N
GODZA
H.T
H.X
HF~
HGLYW
HVGLF
HZI
HZ~
IX1
J0M
K48
KBYEO
LATKE
LC2
LC3
LEEKS
LH4
LITHE
LOXES
LP6
LP7
LUTES
LW6
LYRES
M41
MEWTI
MK4
MRFUL
MRMAN
MRSTM
MSFUL
MSMAN
MSSTM
MXFUL
MXMAN
MXSTM
N04
N05
N9A
NF~
O66
O9-
OIG
OVD
P2W
P2X
P4D
PALCI
PQQKQ
Q.N
Q11
QB0
R.K
RIWAO
RJQFR
ROL
RX1
SAMSI
SUPJJ
TEORI
UB1
W8V
W99
WBKPD
WBNRW
WIH
WIJ
WIK
WOHZO
WPGGZ
WQJ
WRC
WXSBR
XG1
ZZTAW
~IA
~WT
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
AAMNL
AAYXX
CITATION
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c3201-cd596087ee267621a6515f964f13da6a722a99930660bf4f612c9f16cbde0bce3
IEDL.DBID 33P
ISSN 1059-941X
IngestDate Fri Aug 16 01:02:46 EDT 2024
Thu Nov 21 22:00:42 EST 2024
Sat Sep 28 07:57:23 EDT 2024
Sat Aug 24 01:06:16 EDT 2024
Wed Oct 30 10:00:03 EDT 2024
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 2
Language English
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c3201-cd596087ee267621a6515f964f13da6a722a99930660bf4f612c9f16cbde0bce3
Notes ArticleID:JOPR161
istex:E87D80A3C90B87ECFD8BE858A5FF95B13AEC6584
ark:/67375/WNG-VLVRN4WQ-T
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
PMID 17362421
PQID 70275148
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 6
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_70275148
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1532_849X_2007_00161_x
pubmed_primary_17362421
wiley_primary_10_1111_j_1532_849X_2007_00161_x_JOPR161
istex_primary_ark_67375_WNG_VLVRN4WQ_T
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2007-03
March/April 2007
2007 Mar-Apr
2007-03-00
20070301
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2007-03-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 03
  year: 2007
  text: 2007-03
PublicationDecade 2000
PublicationPlace Malden, USA
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Malden, USA
– name: United States
PublicationTitle Journal of prosthodontics
PublicationTitleAlternate J Prosthodont
PublicationYear 2007
Publisher Blackwell Publishing Inc
Publisher_xml – name: Blackwell Publishing Inc
References Bidez MW, Misch CE: Force transfer in implant dentistry: basic concepts and principles. J Oral Implantol 1992;18:264-274
Caputo AA, Standlee JP: Biomechanics in Clinical Dentistry. Chicago , IL , Quintessence, 1987, pp 19-27
Yacoub N, Ismail YH, Mao JJ: Transmission of bone strain in the craniofacial bones of edentulous human skulls upon dental implant loading. J Prosthet Dent 2002;88:192-199
Pietrabissa R, Contro R, Quaglini V, et al: Experimental and computational approach for the evaluation of the biomechanical effects of dental bridge misfit. J Biomech 2000;33:1489-1495
Binon P, Sutter F, Beaty K, et al: The role of screws in implant systems. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994;9(Suppl):48-63
Guichet DL, Caputo AA, Choi H, et al: Passivity of fit and marginal opening in screw- or cement-retained implant fixed partial denture designs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:239-246
Millington ND, Leung T: Inaccurate fit of implant superstructures. Part 1: stresses generated on the superstructure relative to the size of fit discrepancy. Int J Prosthodont 1995;8:511-516
O'Mahony A, Bowles Q, Woolsey G, et al: Stress distribution in the single-unit osseointegrated dental implant: finite element analyses of axial and off-axial loading. Implant Dent 2000;9:207-216
Canay S, Hersek N, Akpinar I, et al: Comparison of stress distribution around vertical and angled implants with finite-element analysis. Quintessence Int 1996;27:591-598
French AA, Bowles CQ, Parham PL, et al: Comparison of peri-implant stresses transmitted by four commercially available osseointegrated implants. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1989;9:221-230
Krekmanov L: Placement of posterior mandibular and maxillary implants in patients with severe bone defiency: a clinical report of procedure. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:722-730
Rangert B, Jemt T, Jorneus L: Forces and moments on Brånemark implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1989;4:241-247
Jemt T, Lekholm U: Measurements of bone and frame-work deformations induced by misfit of implant superstructures: a pilot study in rabbits. Clin Oral Implants Res 1998;9:272-280
Nishimura RD, Ochiai KT, Caputo AA, et al: Photoelastic stress analysis of load transfer to implants and natural teeth comparing rigid and semirigid connectors. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:696-703
Jemt T: Failures and complications in 391 consecutively inserted fixed prostheses supported by Branemark implants in edentulous jaws: a study of treatment from the time of prosthesis placement to the first annual checkup. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991;6:270-276
Brosh T, Pilo R, Sudai D: The influence of abutment angulation on strains and stresses along the implant/bone interface: comparison between two experimental techniques. J Prosthet Dent 1998;79:328-334
1994; 9
1989; 4
2000; 15
2000; 33
2000; 9
1989; 9
2002; 88
1987
1992; 18
1985
1999; 81
1996; 27
1995; 8
1998; 9
1991; 6
1998; 79
e_1_2_7_5_2
e_1_2_7_2_2
e_1_2_7_9_2
Binon P (e_1_2_7_4_2) 1994; 9
Jemt T (e_1_2_7_18_2) 1991; 6
e_1_2_7_16_2
Krekmanov L (e_1_2_7_10_2) 2000; 15
e_1_2_7_15_2
French AA (e_1_2_7_17_2) 1989; 9
Rangert B (e_1_2_7_12_2) 1989; 4
e_1_2_7_11_2
Guichet DL (e_1_2_7_6_2) 2000; 15
Millington ND (e_1_2_7_3_2) 1995; 8
Lekholm U (e_1_2_7_8_2) 1985
Bidez MW (e_1_2_7_7_2) 1992; 18
Canay S (e_1_2_7_13_2) 1996; 27
Caputo AA (e_1_2_7_14_2) 1987
References_xml – volume: 15
  start-page: 722
  year: 2000
  end-page: 730
  article-title: Placement of posterior mandibular and maxillary implants in patients with severe bone defiency: a clinical report of procedure
  publication-title: Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants
– volume: 4
  start-page: 241
  year: 1989
  end-page: 247
  article-title: Forces and moments on Brånemark implants
  publication-title: Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants
– volume: 6
  start-page: 270
  year: 1991
  end-page: 276
  article-title: Failures and complications in 391 consecutively inserted fixed prostheses supported by Branemark implants in edentulous jaws: a study of treatment from the time of prosthesis placement to the first annual checkup
  publication-title: Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants
– volume: 88
  start-page: 192
  year: 2002
  end-page: 199
  article-title: Transmission of bone strain in the craniofacial bones of edentulous human skulls upon dental implant loading
  publication-title: J Prosthet Dent
– volume: 18
  start-page: 264
  year: 1992
  end-page: 274
  article-title: Force transfer in implant dentistry: basic concepts and principles
  publication-title: J Oral Implantol
– volume: 81
  start-page: 696
  year: 1999
  end-page: 703
  article-title: Photoelastic stress analysis of load transfer to implants and natural teeth comparing rigid and semirigid connectors
  publication-title: J Prosthet Dent
– volume: 9
  start-page: 272
  year: 1998
  end-page: 280
  article-title: Measurements of bone and frame‐work deformations induced by misfit of implant superstructures: a pilot study in rabbits
  publication-title: Clin Oral Implants Res
– volume: 8
  start-page: 511
  year: 1995
  end-page: 516
  article-title: Inaccurate fit of implant superstructures. Part 1: stresses generated on the superstructure relative to the size of fit discrepancy
  publication-title: Int J Prosthodont
– start-page: 19
  year: 1987
  end-page: 27
– volume: 33
  start-page: 1489
  year: 2000
  end-page: 1495
  article-title: Experimental and computational approach for the evaluation of the biomechanical effects of dental bridge misfit
  publication-title: J Biomech
– volume: 15
  start-page: 239
  year: 2000
  end-page: 246
  article-title: Passivity of fit and marginal opening in screw‐ or cement‐retained implant fixed partial denture designs
  publication-title: Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants
– volume: 27
  start-page: 591
  year: 1996
  end-page: 598
  article-title: Comparison of stress distribution around vertical and angled implants with finite‐element analysis
  publication-title: Quintessence Int
– volume: 9
  start-page: 207
  year: 2000
  end-page: 216
  article-title: Stress distribution in the single‐unit osseointegrated dental implant: finite element analyses of axial and off‐axial loading
  publication-title: Implant Dent
– volume: 9
  start-page: 221
  year: 1989
  end-page: 230
  article-title: Comparison of peri‐implant stresses transmitted by four commercially available osseointegrated implants
  publication-title: Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent
– start-page: 233
  year: 1985
  end-page: 240
– volume: 79
  start-page: 328
  year: 1998
  end-page: 334
  article-title: The influence of abutment angulation on strains and stresses along the implant/bone interface: comparison between two experimental techniques
  publication-title: J Prosthet Dent
– volume: 9
  start-page: 48
  issue: Suppl
  year: 1994
  end-page: 63
  article-title: The role of screws in implant systems
  publication-title: Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants
– volume: 6
  start-page: 270
  year: 1991
  ident: e_1_2_7_18_2
  article-title: Failures and complications in 391 consecutively inserted fixed prostheses supported by Branemark implants in edentulous jaws: a study of treatment from the time of prosthesis placement to the first annual checkup
  publication-title: Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants
  contributor:
    fullname: Jemt T
– ident: e_1_2_7_5_2
  doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1998.090408.x
– ident: e_1_2_7_16_2
  doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(99)70109-5
– volume: 15
  start-page: 239
  year: 2000
  ident: e_1_2_7_6_2
  article-title: Passivity of fit and marginal opening in screw‐ or cement‐retained implant fixed partial denture designs
  publication-title: Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants
  contributor:
    fullname: Guichet DL
– start-page: 233
  volume-title: Tissue‐Integrated Prostheses: Osseointegration in Clinical Dentistry
  year: 1985
  ident: e_1_2_7_8_2
  contributor:
    fullname: Lekholm U
– volume: 8
  start-page: 511
  year: 1995
  ident: e_1_2_7_3_2
  article-title: Inaccurate fit of implant superstructures. Part 1: stresses generated on the superstructure relative to the size of fit discrepancy
  publication-title: Int J Prosthodont
  contributor:
    fullname: Millington ND
– ident: e_1_2_7_9_2
  doi: 10.1097/00008505-200009030-00006
– volume: 9
  start-page: 221
  year: 1989
  ident: e_1_2_7_17_2
  article-title: Comparison of peri‐implant stresses transmitted by four commercially available osseointegrated implants
  publication-title: Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent
  contributor:
    fullname: French AA
– ident: e_1_2_7_11_2
  doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70246-X
– ident: e_1_2_7_2_2
  doi: 10.1016/S0021-9290(00)00089-0
– ident: e_1_2_7_15_2
  doi: 10.1067/mpr.2002.127401
– volume: 27
  start-page: 591
  year: 1996
  ident: e_1_2_7_13_2
  article-title: Comparison of stress distribution around vertical and angled implants with finite‐element analysis
  publication-title: Quintessence Int
  contributor:
    fullname: Canay S
– volume: 15
  start-page: 722
  year: 2000
  ident: e_1_2_7_10_2
  article-title: Placement of posterior mandibular and maxillary implants in patients with severe bone defiency: a clinical report of procedure
  publication-title: Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants
  contributor:
    fullname: Krekmanov L
– volume: 9
  start-page: 48
  year: 1994
  ident: e_1_2_7_4_2
  article-title: The role of screws in implant systems
  publication-title: Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants
  contributor:
    fullname: Binon P
– volume: 18
  start-page: 264
  year: 1992
  ident: e_1_2_7_7_2
  article-title: Force transfer in implant dentistry: basic concepts and principles
  publication-title: J Oral Implantol
  contributor:
    fullname: Bidez MW
– volume: 4
  start-page: 241
  year: 1989
  ident: e_1_2_7_12_2
  article-title: Forces and moments on Brånemark implants
  publication-title: Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants
  contributor:
    fullname: Rangert B
– start-page: 19
  volume-title: Biomechanics in Clinical Dentistry
  year: 1987
  ident: e_1_2_7_14_2
  contributor:
    fullname: Caputo AA
SSID ssj0011581
Score 1.9895568
Snippet Purpose: The objective of this work was to compare by photoelastic analysis the stress distribution along a fixed framework placed over angled or parallel...
The objective of this work was to compare by photoelastic analysis the stress distribution along a fixed framework placed over angled or parallel implants with...
Purpose : The objective of this work was to compare by photoelastic analysis the stress distribution along a fixed framework placed over angled or parallel...
PURPOSEThe objective of this work was to compare by photoelastic analysis the stress distribution along a fixed framework placed over angled or parallel...
SourceID proquest
crossref
pubmed
wiley
istex
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 117
SubjectTerms Compressive Strength
dental implant
Dental Implants
Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported - methods
Dental Stress Analysis
Dentistry
Elasticity
fixed prosthesis
framework
implant-supported prosthesis
photoelasticity
Title Stress Distribution after Installation of Fixed Frameworks with Marginal Gaps over Angled and Parallel Implants: A Photoelastic Analysis
URI https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/WNG-VLVRN4WQ-T/fulltext.pdf
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fj.1532-849X.2007.00161.x
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17362421
https://search.proquest.com/docview/70275148
Volume 16
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lb9NAEB5BOZQL5dEWlxbmgLi5irOOH9yipmkVoRDaNMlttetdAyKyq7iR8hP42cys40CkHqqKm2157fXsjveb2Zn5AD7qRAlC0YlPi6H2w9waX5MdRDaPiUzK9Vecv-PyOh7Okt45l8kZNLkwdX2IjcONNcP9r1nBla62lbwjSJvDdNZUIiT0csp4kowGl80hRpsNhaDj-EoZTfhpGMy2g3rufdDWSvWMhb66D4Zuo1q3LPX3_ucHvYQXa3CK3Xo2vYIntngNuz0OKGJOuDfw-9qllmCPz9dMWehoxpGjDtgp7y6VOfZ_rqzBfhP7VSF7fJF5dZmHCy_UbYUcPord4vuc7lSFwZFaMLXLHLlmMQfofMYujn6Ud6UlkE-dwqaGyj7c9M_HZ5f-msvBzwRhDD8zHbKVktjadkT_30AxBXueRmEeCKMiFbfbirAqGTBRS-dhTsArS_MgyrSxLZ1ZcQA7RVnYt4BaZIFKhKBJlodGxzq0SlmCcrplssQmHgTNuMnbumSH_MfUIRlLljETcPLeO8lYrjz45AZ400AtfnHIW9yR0-GFnHyZXA3D6Tc59uBDMwMkKSLvrqjClstKxrwBTMalB4f1xPj78lhwFk7gQeTG_8G9koOvoys6Onpsw3fwvPZFc8zcMezcLZb2BJ5WZvneqccf8LQNuA
link.rule.ids 315,782,786,1408,27933,27934,46064,46488
linkProvider Wiley-Blackwell
linkToHtml http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lb9swDCa29tBd2r3rvcrDsJuHOFL86C1YmmZrlmVt1uYmSJa8FivsImmA_IT97JFynC1AD8Owm21YtiyR1keK5Afw1qRaEIpOQ1oMTSgLZ0NDdhDZPDa2Gddf8f6OwVkymqa9Iy6Tc9LkwtT1IdYON9YM_79mBWeH9KaWdwSps8ymTSlCgi_vCVBuy5jkkvM5xHi9pRB1PGMp44kwk9F0M6znzidtrFXbPOzLu4DoJq71C1N_779-0kPYXeFT7NYC9QjuufIx7PQ4pohp4Z7AzzOfXYI9Pl-RZaFnGkcOPGC_vL9UFdi_WjqL_Sb8a47s9EWm1mUqLjzWN3PkCFLslt-v6U5dWhzrGbO7XCOXLeYYnUPs4viyuq0c4XzqFDZlVJ7Ct_7R5MMgXNE5hLkgmBHmtkPmUpo4147pFxxpZmEvslgWkbA61km7rQmukg0Tt0whC8JeeVZEcW6sa5nciWewVVal2wc0Io90KgTJWSGtSYx0WjtCc6Zl89SlAUTNxKmbumqH-sPaoTFWPMbMwcnb7zTGahnAOz_D6wZ69oOj3pKOuhgdq_Ph-elIXnxVkwAOGhFQpIu8waJLVy3mKuE9YLIvA3heS8bvlyeCE3GiAGIvAH_dK_Xpy_iUjl78a8MD2BlMPg_V8OPo5CU8qF3THEL3CrZuZwv3Gu7P7eKN15VfAScR4A
linkToPdf http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3JbtswEB2kCdD20j2tuiQ8FL2psExaS29GHWVp4KpJmvhGkCLZBjEkw44Bf0I-OzOU5dZADkHRmySIEjXkiG8WzgP4qFPFEUWnIS6GOhTOmlCjHYQ2j4lNRvVXvL_j4DQZjtLBHpXJOWr3wjT1IVYON9IM_78mBZ8Yt67kPY7aLLJRW4kQ0ctnxJNbAlE51dHnvFhFFKKeJywlOBFmIhqtZ_Xc-aS1pWqLpL64C4euw1q_LuVP_-cXPYMnS3TK-s10eg4btnoBjwaUUUSkcC_h5tTvLWEDOl9SZTHPM84o7YC88v5S7Vh-ubCG5W3y14yRy5cRsS4RcbF9NZkxyh9l_erXGO9UlWGFmhK3y5hR0WLK0PnC-qz4XV_XFlE-doq1RVRewc987-zrQbgkcwhLjiAjLE0PjaU0sbYb4w84UsTB7rJYuIgbFauk21UIVtGCiTvaCYfIq8xcFJfa2I4uLd-Gzaqu7BtgmpeRSjnHWeaE0YkWVimLWE53TJnaNICoHTc5aWp2yL9sHZSxJBkTAycF31HGchHAJz_AqwZqekU5b0lPXgz35fnx-clQXPyQZwHstjNAoiZSeEVVtp7PZEIRYLQuA3jdTIw_L084bcOJAoj9-N-7V_Loe3GCR2__teEuPCwGuTw-HH57B48bvzTlz72Hzevp3H6ABzMz3_GacguPzBCG
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Stress+Distribution+after+Installation+of+Fixed+Frameworks+with+Marginal+Gaps+over+Angled+and+Parallel+Implants%3A+A+Photoelastic+Analysis&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+prosthodontics&rft.au=Markarian%2C+Roberto+Adrian&rft.au=Ueda%2C+Cristiane&rft.au=Sendyk%2C+Claudio+Luiz&rft.au=Lagan%C3%A1%2C+Dalva+Cruz&rft.date=2007-03-01&rft.pub=Blackwell+Publishing+Inc&rft.issn=1059-941X&rft.eissn=1532-849X&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=117&rft.epage=122&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2Fj.1532-849X.2007.00161.x&rft.externalDBID=10.1111%252Fj.1532-849X.2007.00161.x&rft.externalDocID=JOPR161
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1059-941X&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1059-941X&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1059-941X&client=summon