Stress Distribution after Installation of Fixed Frameworks with Marginal Gaps over Angled and Parallel Implants: A Photoelastic Analysis
Purpose: The objective of this work was to compare by photoelastic analysis the stress distribution along a fixed framework placed over angled or parallel implants with different gap values between the framework and one of the implants. Materials and Methods: Two photoelastic models were created: (i...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of prosthodontics Vol. 16; no. 2; pp. 117 - 122 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Malden, USA
Blackwell Publishing Inc
01-03-2007
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Purpose: The objective of this work was to compare by photoelastic analysis the stress distribution along a fixed framework placed over angled or parallel implants with different gap values between the framework and one of the implants.
Materials and Methods: Two photoelastic models were created: (i) with parallel implants; (ii) with a 30° angled central implant. In both cases, three implants were used, and CP titanium frameworks were constructed with commercial components. A plane polariscope was used to observe the photoelastic fringes generated after initial framework assembly, and also when an axial load of 100 N was applied over the central implant. For both models, stress analysis was conducted on well‐fitting frameworks and on another with a 150 μm vertical gap between the framework and the central implant.
Results: The photoelastic analysis indicated that in the model with parallel implants, stress distribution followed the implant axis, and in the model with an angled implant, a higher and nonhomogeneous stress concentration was observed around the apical region of the lateral implants. The placement of an ill‐fitting framework resulted in increased preload stress patterns.
Conclusion: Stresses were generated after screw tightening of the frameworks, increasing when a load was applied and when a vertical gap was present. Angled implants resulted in oblique stress patterns, which were not transferred with homogeneity to the polymeric model. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ArticleID:JOPR161 istex:E87D80A3C90B87ECFD8BE858A5FF95B13AEC6584 ark:/67375/WNG-VLVRN4WQ-T ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1059-941X 1532-849X |
DOI: | 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2007.00161.x |