Mythical dementia and Alzheimerised senility: discrepant and intersecting representations of cognitive decline in later life

• Published in: Social theory & health Vol. 18; no. 1; pp. 50 - 65
• Main Author: Fletcher, James Rupert
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London Palgrave Macmillan UK 01-03-2020; Palgrave Macmillan
• Subjects: Alzheimer's disease; Behavioral responses; Biomedicine; Cognition; Cognitive ability; Cognitive impairment; Community research; Comorbidity; Dementia; Dementia disorders; Global health; Health promotion; Illnesses; Medical diagnosis; Medical research; Medical Sociology; Original Article; Personality; Political factors; Social Sciences; Social Theory; Sociology; Senility; Diagnosis; Disease; Alzheimer’s; Illness; Dementia
• ISSN: 1477-8211; 1477-822X
• DOI: 10.1057/s41285-019-00117-w

Dementia is a growing global health concern as worldwide incidence increases amidst population ageing. How people affected by dementia understand the condition is important in influencing their emotional and behavioural responses to it. Improved knowledge of these understandings could inform support that is better tailored to people’s needs. The biomedical research community articulates an understanding of ‘mythical dementia’ comprising a syndrome of cognitive decline caused by numerous discrete neuropathological processes. In this paper, I draw on data from interviews with people affected by dementia to explore how their understandings of dementia differ from the biomedical ‘mythical dementia’. People affected by dementia articulate understandings of ‘Alzheimerised senility’, attributing personal change to a combination of illness, ageing and personality, within a broader context of comorbidity and semi-naturalised decline. These understandings resemble traditional notions of senility, but they are Alzheimerised through the introduction of biomedical ideas. These findings are important in the contemporary political context of early diagnosis promotion.