Electric vehicle battery-ultracapacitor hybrid energy storage system and drivetrain optimization for a real-world urban driving scenario

• Published in: Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering Vol. 43; no. 5
• Main Authors: Silva, Ludmila C. A., Eckert, Jony J., Lourenço, Maria A. M., Silva, Fabricio L., Corrêa, Fernanda C., Dedini, Franco G.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Berlin/Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 01-05-2021; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Configuration management; Electric motors; Electric vehicles; Energy storage; Engineering; Flux density; Genetic algorithms; Hybrid systems; Mechanical Engineering; Optimization; Parameters; Power management; Powertrain; Technical Paper; Hybrid energy storage system (HESS); Electric vehicle (EV); Real-world driving cycle; Genetic algorithm optimization
• ISSN: 1678-5878; 1806-3691
• DOI: 10.1007/s40430-021-02975-w

A battery has normally a high energy density with low power density, while an ultracapacitor has a high power density but a low energy density. Therefore, this paper has been proposed to associate more than one storage technology generating a hybrid energy storage system (HESS), which has battery and ultracapacitor, whose objective is to improve the electric vehicle (EV) driving range. The HESS parameters have been evaluated in a configuration of EV powered by two in-wheel electric motors, coupled straight into the front wheels, and by a unique EM, connected to a differential transmission to drive the rear wheels. Moreover, this paper considers a real-world drive cycle based on the urban driving behavior of Campinas city, one of the most populous cities in Brazil. Aiming to minimize the HESS size and enhance the EV driving range, an optimization problem was formulated and solved using a genetic algorithm technique, in which the EV drivetrain parameters and HESS components and control are optimized. Finally, the obtained Pareto frontier defines the optimum EV configurations, in which the best-selected configurations were able to perform up to 188 km with a 418 kg HESS (maximum drive range solution), or 82.75 km with a 146.58 kg HESS (minimum HESS solution) and 319 km with a 188.43 kg HESS (best trade-off solution), without presenting performance losses.